Can C14 Atoms Be Detected Using NMR Despite 0% Natural Abundance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of detecting carbon C14 atoms using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) despite its 0% natural abundance. The formula for calculating the frequency required for NMR is provided as f = (2⋅I) ⋅ (g ⋅B ⋅μ)/(1836 ⋅h), where I is the nuclear spin, g is the g-factor, B is the magnetic field strength, μ is the Bohr magneton, and h is the Planck constant. While it is theoretically possible to detect C14 with an enriched sample, the extremely low natural abundance of C14 compared to C13, which has a 1.1% abundance, makes routine C14 NMR impractical. C13 NMR is widely used due to its favorable properties for high-resolution spectroscopy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) principles
  • Familiarity with the formula for NMR frequency calculation
  • Knowledge of nuclear spin and g-factor concepts
  • Basic understanding of isotopes and their natural abundances
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for enriching carbon C14 samples for NMR analysis
  • Learn about the differences in NMR spectroscopy between C13 and C14 isotopes
  • Explore the applications of C13 NMR in organic chemistry
  • Investigate the limitations of NMR for isotopes with low natural abundance
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in nuclear physics, chemists specializing in spectroscopy, and professionals involved in radiocarbon dating will benefit from this discussion.

HastiM
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



We want to image carbon C14 atoms using NMR with magnetic field of B=3 T. What frequency do we need to use? Use the following facts: C14 has 0% abundance, nuclear spin of I=3 and g=0.273

Homework Equations



The frequency is given by f= (2⋅I) ⋅ (g ⋅B ⋅μ)/(1836 ⋅h), where μ is the Bohr magneton and h is the Planck constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



Of course, there is no problem to determine the frequency f by plugging in all the relevant constants into the formula above. I have a question regarding the information of '0% abundance', because I do not know how it effects the outcome. In class we determined the analogous situation for carbon C13, which has an abundance of 1.1 %. We just used the formula above and ignored the abundance completely. But I could not find anything regarding the NMR of Carbon C14. Is it maybe possible that C14 is not detectable by NMR, due to the 0% abundance?

I would very much appreciate your help! [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HastiM said:
I have a question regarding the information of '0% abundance', because I do not know how it effects the outcome. In class we determined the analogous situation for carbon C13, which has an abundance of 1.1 %. We just used the formula above and ignored the abundance completely.
This is fine.
HastiM said:
But I could not find anything regarding the NMR of Carbon C14. Is it maybe possible that C14 is not detectable by NMR, due to the 0% abundance?
As long as the sample has C14, you should be able to detect it, given the proper experimental setup. You could, for example, enrich the sample with C14 to do NMR. However, as you've noted, the natural abundance of C14 is extremely low (really only permits radiocarbon dating at very low concentrations), and C13 is 1) abundant in comparison, and 2) a spin-1/2 nucleus, which makes its relaxation process simpler and more amenable to high-resolution spectroscopy. In fact, I've never heard of anyone performing routine C14 NMR, whereas C13 NMR is ubiquitous.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K