Can Cosine or Sine Values be Expressed Using Roots of Rationals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the expressibility of cosine and sine values in terms of roots of rationals, particularly in relation to cyclotomic polynomials and Galois groups. The polynomial for the 7th roots of unity, \(p = x^6 + x^5 + x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1\), has a Galois group \(\mathbb{Z}_7\), indicating that all roots can be expressed as rational functions combined with radicals. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the structure of these roots and suggests consulting modern interpretations of Gauss' work on cyclotomic groups for deeper insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Galois theory and its applications
  • Familiarity with cyclotomic polynomials
  • Knowledge of roots of unity and their properties
  • Basic concepts of field extensions in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cyclotomic fields and their Galois groups
  • Research the implications of Gauss' work on cyclotomic groups
  • Learn about the expressibility of trigonometric functions in terms of radicals
  • Explore the relationship between roots of unity and polynomial roots
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students interested in Galois theory, cyclotomic fields, and the expressibility of trigonometric values in algebraic terms.

gonzo
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
This is indirectly related to issues with cyclotomic polynomials and glaois groups.

Is there some easy way to know if you are dealing with a cos or sin that is expressable in terms of roots of rationals? Like [itex]\pi/3[/itex] for example? If so, is there any straightforward way of figuring it out?

I'm asking because I'm trying to do a problem involving the galois group for the 7th roots of unity. The fact that there is a order 2 and order 3 subgroup of the galois group makes me think that Q(i) must be a fixed field and then some cube root another one for the subgroups. This would further imply that [itex]cos(4\pi/7)[/itex] is expressable as a ratioal function plus a cube root (unless I'm way off in space, which is possible).

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A very interesting problem. I'm not very fluent with Galois theory these days, so please take my words with a grain of salt.

For the 7th roots of unity we have the polynomial

[tex](x-1)^7 \quad = \quad (x-1)(x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)[/tex]

So the interesting polynomial for these roots is:

[tex]p \quad = \quad x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1[/tex]

Now, it is obvious that this polynomial has as Galois group [tex]\mathbb{Z}_7[/tex]. If we call [tex]\omega[/tex] some seventh root of unity (not 1), the other roots of [tex]p[/tex] are the powers [tex]\omega^k,\, k=2,\ldots, 6[/tex]. Hence the field for this polynomial is [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\omega)[/tex], extension of dimension 7 over [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex], and its automorphisms are obviously the powers of the roots.

The group [tex]\mathbb{Z}_7[/tex] has no nontrivial subgroups. I think you are erroneously taking [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6[/tex] as the Galois group of the polynomial p.

Anyway, we come to the conclusion that any root of our polynomial p has the form [tex]a_0 + a_1\omega + a_2\omega^2 + a_3\omega^3 + a_4\omega^4 + a_5\omega^5 + a_6\omega^6[/tex], where the [tex]a_i[/tex] are rationals. Since [tex]\omega[/tex] is a radical (a seventh root of unity), this trivially means that all the roots of p are radicals.

However, I think that in order to get better information on the structure of the roots, the coefficients [tex]a_i[/tex], etc., you could try reading modern elaborations of Gauss' works on cyclotomic groups. I hope this link helps : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_period

----

If you take sixth roots of unity, you have [tex]\mathbb{Z}_6 \cong \mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_2[/tex], so the Galois group should be generated by two radicals [tex]\mathbb{Q}(i,\xi)[/tex], with [tex]\xi^3 = 1[/tex].

This means that the sixth roots of unity should be writeable in the form: [tex]a_0 + a_1 i + a_2 \xi + a_3 i\xi + a_4\xi^2 + a_5i\xi^2[/tex]. Again, more finese in the form of these roots should be achieved turning to Gauss' works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 121 ·
5
Replies
121
Views
25K