- #1
jostpuur
- 2,116
- 19
I'm trying to read this:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1584883936/?tag=pfamazon01-20
On the pages 12-13 it says:
The bold part is where lose the track. Why are quantities, which are invariant under permutations of roots, expressible in some certain way?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1584883936/?tag=pfamazon01-20
On the pages 12-13 it says:
For example, if a cubic polynomial has roots [itex]\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3[/itex] and [itex]\omega[/itex] is a primitive cube root of unity, then the expression
[tex]
u = (\alpha_1 + \omega\alpha_2 + \omega^2\alpha_3)^3
[/tex]
takes exactly two distinct values. In fact, even permutations leave it unchanged, while odd permutations transform it to
[tex]
v = (\alpha_1 + \omega^2\alpha_2 + \omega\alpha_3)^3
[/tex]
It follows that [itex]u+v[/itex] and [itex]uv[/itex] are fixed by all permutations of the roots and must, therefore, be expressible as rational functions of the coefficients. That is, [itex]u[/itex] and [itex]v[/itex] are solutions of a quadratic equation, and can thus be expressed using square roots.
The bold part is where lose the track. Why are quantities, which are invariant under permutations of roots, expressible in some certain way?
Last edited by a moderator: