Is My Understanding of the Generalized Stokes' Theorem Correct?

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter davidge
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
davidge
Messages
553
Reaction score
21
I was interested in finding a motivation for the generalized Stokes' theorem. I was asking myself why
$$ \int_D d \omega = \int_{\partial D} \omega $$ for a region ##D## and a (p-1)-dimensional form ##\omega##.
Then I found something funny when working with some arbitrary functions in two dimensions. Below is what I found.
In the second image, I called ##x^{\mu}_{i}## and ##x^{\mu}_{f}## the coordinates of the initial and final points, respectively.
My question is: Is this actually correct?

kLxFrqv.png

OTrcGLW.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about that generalization from 2 to p dimensions that I did above.