Can Derivative Methods Determine the Correct Angle in Physics Problems?

AI Thread Summary
Derivative methods can effectively determine the correct angle in physics problems, particularly when analyzing forces. It is essential to specify units clearly, such as using "1500sin(θ) Nm." Considering the force acting at the center of the arc simplifies calculations, as the horizontal component does not create a moment about point O. The initial statement about deriving and equating to zero for angles between 0 and 180° is correct. Overall, clarity in terminology and proper unit specification are crucial for accurate problem-solving.
Tapias5000
Messages
46
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Determine the moment of the force with respect to point O as a function of θ . for what value of θ in the range between 0° and 180° is the moment at its maximum? what is the value of the moment in this case?
Relevant Equations
Mo= R x F
This is the image of the problem:
Captura.PNG

I tried to solve it and I got the following is it correct?

1631573856591.png

derive and equal to 0 because it is between an angle of 0 and 180° is this statement correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine, though you should specify units everywhere, e.g. ##1500\sin(\theta)Nm##.

You can take the point of action of a force as anywhere along its line of action, so it is simpler to consider the force acting at the centre of the arc. The horizontal component then has no moment about O, and you can write the answer down immediately.

Btw, you put "momentum" in the title instead of "moment".
 
haruspex said:
Looks fine, though you should specify units everywhere, e.g. ##1500\sin(\theta)Nm##.

You can take the point of action of a force as anywhere along its line of action, so it is simpler to consider the force acting at the centre of the arc. The horizontal component then has no moment about O, and you can write the answer down immediately.

Btw, you put "momentum" in the title instead of "moment".
ok, but I still need to find the angle, is the statement I said correct to find it?
 
Tapias5000 said:
ok, but I still need to find the angle, is the statement I said correct to find it?
Yes.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top