Can different arguments be correct for the same complex number?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the argument of the complex number -1 - √3i, specifically exploring the validity of different arguments for the same complex number, such as -120 degrees and 240 degrees.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equivalence of -120 degrees and 240 degrees as arguments for the complex number, questioning the conventions used in textbooks regarding the principal argument.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different conventions for expressing the argument of complex numbers, with some participants suggesting that multiple angles can represent the same point. Guidance is provided regarding the principal argument and its customary range.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that different texts may have varying conventions for the range of arguments, which could lead to confusion. There is also mention of how calculators and computational tools may adhere to specific conventions, impacting the results presented to users.

Maxo
Messages
160
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate argument of complex number
-1-\sqrt{3}i

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


The argument of this is -120 degrees but why couldn't we as well say it's 240 degrees? Since going 240 degrees will go to the same point as -120 degrees. Why is this false?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you say it is false? Yes, -120 degrees is the same as 360- 120= 240. If your textbook gives -120 as the argument that does not necessarily mean 240 is not. But perhaps your text is using a particular convention here: in order to avoid ambiguity some texts require that angles be given between -180 and 180 degrees, others between 0 and 360 degrees.

(Personally, I would have said that the argument was 4\pi/3. I am a little surprised you are using degrees rather than radians.)
 
The answer can be any multiple of 2\pi radians, but it's just been chosen so that the principal argument (smallest angle) is in the range (-\pi,\pi]. It's just a custom really.
 
Maxo said:

Wolfram Alpha is abiding by the principal argument custom. When you use calculators, you sometimes need to have an understanding of what their unexpected results could mean.

Like this one:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28-1%29%5E%281%2F3%29

Notice it says "Assuming the principal root". There are 3 roots, and the one with the smallest argument which is was returned to the user, while many people would expect the answer to be -1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K