Can electrostatic forces explain electron configurations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores whether electrostatic forces can explain electron configurations in atomic structure, specifically focusing on the quantum numbers n, l, and m. The conversation highlights that electron configurations, such as 1s2 and 2p6, arise from quantum restrictions and are represented by wavefunctions rather than definite locations. It confirms that solving the Schrödinger equation in a spherical electrostatic potential yields orbital shapes, and suggests that a computer program can model these configurations by calculating spherical harmonics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum numbers (n, l, m)
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of wavefunctions and probability distributions
  • Basic concepts of electrostatic forces in atomic structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to solve the Schrödinger equation for hydrogen-like atoms
  • Explore the concept of spherical harmonics in quantum mechanics
  • Study the relationship between electrostatic forces and atomic structure
  • Investigate computational modeling of atomic orbitals using software tools
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, physicists, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of atomic structure and electron configurations.

TimH
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I've been studying basic atomic structure-- shells, subshells, orbitals, the four quantum numbers, the periodic table, etc. This is in a chemistry book, but if my question belongs in the physics forum please let me know.

I've seen diagrams of "atomic structure" that show arrangements of electrons: 1s2, 2p2, 2p6 etc. and I understand how the configurations are derived from the quantum numbers. I am curious if the distribution of electrons can be explained in terms of electrostatic forces. That is, if you made a 3-d computer model of point charges around a larger central charge, would you find stable configurations that correspond to anything like the electron configurations you get from the four quantum numbers? I suppose the spin number doesn't fit, but how about n, l, and m?

I hope this question makes sense. What I am really wondering is if atoms can be "explained away" in terms of more basic forces (i.e. electrostatic and strong nuclear to hold the nucleus together), or is an atom more than the sum of its parts, that is, is it something you can't presently derive from more basic physics.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron configuration tells you the quantum numbers, eg in the 1s^2, the 1 refers to the principle quantum number n, the s to the angular momentum number l [which can take values 0 -> n-1] and the 2 is the number of spin configurations you can have for this value of l, in this case it is +1/2 and -1/2.
Thus the electronic stucture of the atom is determined by the varies quantum restrictions on the values of variables it can possess. To explain this, you must remember that the electron is not a particle, but is described by a wavefunction. This is abstract, but you can basically think of this as meaning that the electron has no definitite location in space until it is measured to have one, it has simply a probability of being found at a certain position. The electron orbitals are basically formed from these probality distructions, or wavefunctions. Solving the Schrödinger equation in a spherical electrostatic potential of an atom will give solutions of the form of the orbitals. So to answer another question, yes a computer program could be written to do this, as you must specify to the program what you want it to do, ie solve the Schrödinger equation, and what form of answer you require, here something called spherical harmonics, it would be the only solution it could give.

the wikipedia page for electronic structure [id link but i haven't got enough posts for that ] gives you some nice pictures of what the orbitals 'look' like, and a nice explanation along the same lines as this, so you can read if i have been unclear. i
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K