Can Energy Be Saved When Using an Air Pump to Lift a 5kg Weight?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy efficiency of using an air pump to lift a 5kg weight from an 11m deep lake. Participants conclude that the energy required to operate the air pump will be equal to or greater than the gravitational potential energy (GPE) gained by the weight when lifted. The principle of conservation of energy dictates that it is not possible to use less energy to pump air down than to pull the weight up. The thread also references the impossibility of perpetual motion machines (PMMs) and over-unity mechanisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (GPE)
  • Basic knowledge of air pump mechanics
  • Familiarity with the law of conservation of energy
  • Concept of buoyancy and fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Explore the mechanics of air pumps and their efficiency ratings
  • Study fluid dynamics related to buoyancy and lifting mechanisms
  • Investigate the theoretical limits of energy conversion and perpetual motion machines
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers working with fluid systems, and anyone interested in energy efficiency and mechanical systems.

tiago000000
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! I regularly use the forum to learn but never registered to post anything, as I have nothing to teach really…
But today I have a question regarding the law of conservation of energy that I can’t find the answer to, and maybe someone will help me understand:

(I’ve attached a drawing)
Say we have a weight of 5kg at the bottom of a lake (11m deep), and an upside down 10L bucket above it attached to it by a few strings (9m deep). I then have an efficient air pump above the water line that pumps roughly 20L (I think, because of how it compresses down there) into the bucket and the whole apparatus comes up to the surface.

My question is: is the amount of energy used by the air pump equal/greater than the energy that would be needed to pull the same weight to the same place, or would it be possible for it to be smaller?

And if it was possible to use less energy to pump air down than it would be to pull the weight up, could you use this same principle to produce electric energy?

Ironically, as I’m waiting for the picture to upload, I’ve noticed a thread titled “why we don’t discuss perpetual motion machines”

Thank you everyone and I’m sorry for such a long post!
 

Attachments

  • 1AF17904-EE81-4B49-91D9-E6939059588E.jpeg
    1AF17904-EE81-4B49-91D9-E6939059588E.jpeg
    21.8 KB · Views: 172
Engineering news on Phys.org
tiago000000 said:
Ironically, as I’m waiting for the picture to upload, I’ve noticed a thread titled “why we don’t discuss perpetual motion machines”
Yup.

tiago000000 said:
And if it was possible to use less energy to pump air down than it would be to pull the weight up, could you use this same principle to produce electric energy?
Nope.

tiago000000 said:
My question is: is the amount of energy used by the air pump equal/greater than the energy that would be needed to pull the same weight to the same place, or would it be possible for it to be smaller?
The energy to drive the pump will be equal to or greater than the change in gravitational potential energy (GPE) that the mass gained in being lifted to the surface.

As you noted, we don't discuss PMMs or over-unity mechanisms. Thread is closed for now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and tiago000000

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
907