Intermediate-Calculate a weight using conservation of energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the weight W using the principle of conservation of energy, as presented in the Feynman Lectures. The scenario describes a system where a weight is lowered, and the relationship between the weights and their displacements is explored.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy and question the assumptions necessary for the analysis. There are attempts to relate the displacements of the weights and the energy changes involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering hints and equations related to potential energy changes. Some express uncertainty about the implications of energy conservation during transitions between configurations, while others explore the effects of friction and additional forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of friction in the problem statement and consider how this affects the energy calculations. There is also mention of assumptions regarding the mass of the string and the nature of the system's motion.

Aleoa
Messages
128
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Schermata 2018-04-07 10:09:37.png


This problem comes from the Feynman Lectures. However, the author doesn't explain in detail the procedure to solve the problem.
I have to calculate the weight W using only the law of energy conservation.

Homework Equations



In the second picture W it is lowered of 5 units.
The known weight block is 1 lb.

How can I solve this problem and why ?
In order to apply conservation of energy do I have to assume some properties of this system we are studying?
Thank so much

 

Attachments

  • Schermata 2018-04-07 10:09:37.png
    Schermata 2018-04-07 10:09:37.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 724
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: The string is a fixed length but if the height of one mass changes the height of the other mass doesn't change by the same amount due to the slope.
 
If i apply some force on W and i let it down for 5 units of length (like the pictures), the same force is applyed to the 1 lb block, so the net energy cancels out. However, since the displacement of 5 units of length of W generated the same energy (in absolute value) of 3 units of length of 1 lb ---> W = 3/5 lb.

It's okay or it's possible to do better ? Feynman asks to solve with using only the conservation of energy law...
 
What's the equation for the change in PE?
 
How it's possible to change the configuration of the blocks without violating the conservation of energy law ?

Why if i apply a force on the block W, that makes it go down, I'm SURE that the net energy is balanced by a amount of negative energy produced by the 1 lb block, so that the total energy is 0 ?
 
Aleoa said:
How it's possible to change the configuration of the blocks without violating the conservation of energy law ?

The problem statement does not mention friction. So there are no losses that have to be overcome.

Why if i apply a force on the block W, that makes it go down, I'm SURE that the net energy is balanced by a amount of negative energy produced by the 1 lb block, so that the total energy is 0 ?

Correct.

The problem statement tells you to use this fact (conservation of energy).
 
Write an equation for the change in PE and sum it to zero... Eg...

Change in PE of W + Change in PE of 1kg = 0

Solve for W.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleoa
CWatters said:
Write an equation for the change in PE and sum it to zero... Eg...

Change in PE of W + Change in PE of 1kg = 0

Solve for W.

If i solve the equation you correctly suggest, i will obtain W = 3/5 lb.

My question is a little more subtle. If we are in a real case ( and we consider the lever as reversible, even if in reality isn't possible) and i want to go from the configuration 1 (where W is up) to configuration 2 (where W is down), i have to exert some energy in the system.
Why this transitory is neglected and we consider only the two configurations, and not the transitory that allowed to go from configuration 1 to configuration 2 ?
 
Aleoa said:
My question is a little more subtle. If we are in a real case ( and we consider the lever as reversible, even if in reality isn't possible) and i want to go from the configuration 1 (where W is up) to configuration 2 (where W is down), i have to exert some energy in the system.
Why this transitory is neglected and we consider only the two configurations, and not the transitory that allowed to go from configuration 1 to configuration 2 ?

Let us break it down into steps...

Assumptions:

The string has zero mass
m = total mass of both W and 1lb.
There is no friction

Steps:

1) Configuration 1 - system is stationary
2) You apply a force that accelerates the system to some velocity V (eg the system gains KE=0.5mv^2).
3) The system moves at constant velocity V. (Mass W looses some PE, 1lb mass gains some PE, KE is constant)
4) You apply a force that decelerates the system from V down to zero (eg The system looses KE=0.5mv^2)
5) Configuration 2 - system is stationary

So the KE gained in step 2) is the same as that lost in 4). So we do not need to consider it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleoa
  • #10
If there is friction Ff then to move the weights additional energy is required. How you account for this depends on how the initial force is applied.

One way is to apply a small additional force, let's call it F+ constantly to counteract friction. In other words F+ and Ff are equal and opposite. That way the weights don't slow down in step 3.

If d is the distance moved then...

Without friction...

ΔKE + ΔPE = 0

with friction

ΔKE + ΔPE + F+*d + Ff*d= 0

Remember that F+ and Ff act in opposite directions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleoa

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K