Can Euler-Lagrange Equations Explain Mirages?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using the Euler-Lagrange equations to explain the phenomenon of mirages caused by temperature gradients affecting the refraction index of light. The participants derive the Euler-Lagrange equations from the integral expressions for light travel time, specifically using the refraction index formula, n(y) = n0(1 + αy). They explore two integrals, leading to different forms of the Euler-Lagrange equations, with one resulting in a non-zero equation due to the variable n(y). The final solution simplifies to x = (c2/n0α) arcosh(n0(1 + αy)/c2) + C, which resembles a parabolic graph, confirming the approach's validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Familiarity with Fermat's principle of least time
  • Knowledge of refraction index and its mathematical representation
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Euler-Lagrange equation in physics
  • Explore the implications of Fermat's principle in optics
  • Learn about temperature gradients and their effects on light refraction
  • Investigate advanced integration techniques, including hyperbolic functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on optics and mathematical physics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of physical phenomena like mirages.

Jillds
Messages
22
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


On very hot days there sometimes can be a mirage seen hovering as you drive. Very close to the ground there is a temperature gradient which makes the refraction index rises with the height. Can we explain the mirage with it? Which unit do you need to extremalise? Writer the Euler-Lagrange equation. This gives a differential equation that you need to solve.

Homework Equations


refraction index: ## n =\frac{c}{v} \Leftrightarrow \frac{n}{c}=\frac{1}{v}##
Euler-Lagrange equation: ##\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}##
1st integral: ##\dot{q} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}-L= constant##
## dl^2=dx^2 + dy^2##
tip given: ##n(y) \approx n_0 (1+\alpha y)##

The Attempt at a Solution


Light follows Fermat's principle: not the way of the shortest distance, but shortest time, hence it is time we need to extremalise

##t=\int dt = \int \frac{dl}{dl}dt = \int \frac{dl}{v} = \int \frac{n}{c} dl = \frac{1}{c} \int n(y) \sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2}##

No need to solve this by introducing a third term. The integral can be written in two ways:
1) ##ct = \int n(y) \sqrt{1+\frac{dy^2}{dx^2}}dx = \int n(y) \sqrt{1+\dot{y}^2} dx## with ## L= n(y) \sqrt{1+\dot{y}^2}##
2) ##ct = \int n(y) \sqrt{1+\frac{dx^2}{dy^2}}dy = \int n(y) \sqrt{1+\dot{x}^2} dy## with ## L= n(y) \sqrt{1+\dot{x}^2}##

1) The first integral leads to an Euler-Lagrange equation that does not equal to 0, because n(y) varies with the height:
##\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{y}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial y} \neq 0##

So it needs to be reworked as a 1st integral:
##\dot{y} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{y}}-L= c_1##

I haven't tried to solve this DE yet, because this is the hardest way, but it should have the same solution as the second Lagrange.

2) The second integral does lead to an Euler-Lagrange equation that equals 0:
##\frac{d}{dy}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0##

Hence ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}=c_2##
## c_2 = \frac{n(y) \dot{x}}{\sqrt{\dot{x}^2+1}}##
## \Leftrightarrow c_2^2 = \frac{n^2(y) \dot{x}^2}{\dot{x}^2+1}##
## \Leftrightarrow c_2^2 (\dot{x}^2+1)= n^2(y) \dot{x}^2##
## \Leftrightarrow c_2^2 \dot{x}^2+c_2^2= n^2(y) \dot{x}^2##
## \Leftrightarrow c_2^2= n^2(y) \dot{x}^2 - c_2^2 \dot{x}^2##
## \Leftrightarrow c_2^2= \dot{x}^2 ( n^2(y) - c_2^2)##
## \Leftrightarrow \dot{x}^2 = \frac{c_2^2}{( n^2(y) - c_2^2)}##
## \Leftrightarrow \dot{x} = \frac{c_2}{\sqrt{ n^2(y) - c_2^2}}##
## \Leftrightarrow \frac{dx}{dy} = \frac{c_2}{\sqrt{ n^2(y) - c_2^2}}##
## \Leftrightarrow dx = \frac{c_2}{\sqrt{ n^2(y) - c_2^2}} dy##
## \Leftrightarrow x = c_2 \int \frac{dy}{\sqrt{ n^2(y) - c_2^2}}##
## \Leftrightarrow x = c_2 \int \frac{dy}{\sqrt{ n_0^2(1+\alpha y)^2 - c_2^2}}##

with ##n_0(1+\alpha y) = u \Leftrightarrow dy = \frac{du}{n_0 \alpha}##

## \Rightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} \int \frac{du}{\sqrt{ u^2 - c_2^2}}##
## \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} \int \frac{du}{\sqrt{ \frac{u^2}{c_2^2} -1 }}\frac{1}{c_2}##
## \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{1}{n_0 \alpha} \int \frac{du}{\sqrt{ \frac{u^2}{c_2^2} -1 }}##

with ##\frac{u}{c}=t \Leftrightarrow du=c dt##

## \Rightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} \int \frac{dt}{\sqrt{ t^2 - 1}}##

with ##t = sec (v) \Leftrightarrow dt = \frac{tan(v)}{cos(v)}dv##

## \Rightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} \int sec(v) dv##
## \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} ln(tan (v) + sec(v))+C##
## \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} ln(tan (arcsec(t)) + t)+C##
## \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} ln(tan (arcsec(\frac{u}{c})) + \frac{u}{c})+C##
## \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{c_2}{n_0 \alpha} ln(tan (arcsec(\frac{n_0(1+\alpha y)}{c_2})) + \frac{n_0(1+\alpha y)}{c_2})+C##

I'm stuck though on the ##tan(arcsec(t))## and how to simplify that. Also when I plug in ##ln(tan(arcsec(x))+x)## into google to check the graph it doesn't give me the graph that we're given (parabolic). So did I solve this wrong so far? And where did I go wrong?

(ETA: mistake in formula of 1st integral)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I managed to figure out the ##tan(arcsec(t))##
##\Leftrightarrow tan(arccos(\frac{1}{t})##

We know the ##cos \theta=\frac{1}{t}##
This would mean that the adjacent of a right triangle has value 1 and the hypothenuse is t. Using Pythagoras we can find the opposite of the angle.

##O^2=H^2-A^2 = t^2-1##
##\Leftrightarrow O=\sqrt{t^2-1}##

So the tangens of the angle would be
##tan (\theta)=\frac{O}{A}=\frac{\sqrt{t^2-1}}{t}##
or
##tan (\theta)=\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{t^2}}t##

reworking that in my current solution that would give

##x=\frac{c_2}{n_0\alpha} ln(\frac{c_2\sqrt{n_0^2(1+\alpha y)^2-c_2^2}+n_0^2(1-\alpha y)^2}{c_2 n_0(1+\alpha y)})+C##
 
But it can all be made simpler considering that ##\int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^2+a^2}}=arcosh(\frac{x}{a})+C##

Then ##x=\frac{c_2}{n_0\alpha} arcosh \frac{n_0(1+\alpha y)}{c_2}+C##
which is the inverse of a cosh function which is the most similar to a parabolic graph. So that would seem to work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K