Can Euler's Formula Illuminate First Order Reaction Kinetics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the application of Euler's formula, exp(i*x) = cos(x) + i * sin(x), to first-order reaction kinetics, specifically the differential equation d[Reactant]/dt = C*[Reactant]. A participant argues against using the complex domain solution, suggesting that it complicates the understanding of reaction kinetics, which can be adequately addressed using a real domain approach. The conversation emphasizes the preference for real solutions in chemical kinetics while acknowledging the potential insights offered by complex solutions, particularly in understanding exponential processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's formula and its implications in mathematics
  • Familiarity with first-order reaction kinetics and the associated differential equations
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their applications in scientific contexts
  • Basic principles of wave-particle duality in physics and chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of complex solutions in differential equations
  • Study the principles of first-order reaction kinetics in detail
  • Explore the relationship between wave functions and particle behavior in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the applications of Euler's formula in various scientific fields
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, physicists, and researchers interested in the mathematical modeling of reaction kinetics, as well as those exploring the intersection of complex analysis and physical sciences.

GregBrown
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Has anyone ever encountered a discussion on the topic of applying Euler's formula

exp(i*x) = cos(x) + i * sin(x)

to the equation governing first order chemical (and nuclear) reaction kinetics?

d[Reactant]/dt = C*[Reactant]
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi CJ, :welcome:

No :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
If you set ##x=-icR## where c is a constant and R is the concentration then ##e^{ix}## is a solution to the differential equation, but this is just needlessly adding complications to the problem.
 
I’m a physician (pathologist) and wholeheartedly endorse your preference for the simpler, Real domain approach, which provides an adequate solution for all observable features of the process. It is that very preference (for the Real domain) that is the point of my post. Indulge me for a moment and consider the implications of the Complex domain solution. Exponential processes may be a “keyhole” through which we can spy a more complete understanding. The Imaginary and Complex domains enlarge the solution space of exponential processes in a way quite beyond lived experience. There simply is nothing in the physical universe that is not amenable to the enumeration and ordering process we refer to as “measurement”, while the Imaginary domain provides no comparable amenity. There are extremely compelling reasons for our preference (for the Real domain) that are reasonably self evident. [this is left as an exercise for the reader]The Complex solution, ##cos{x} + i*sin{x}## necessitates not only that the reaction products are sinusoidal, the reactants must also be sinusoidal. I’m back to where I started: there are no “particles”, only waves
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
GregBrown said:
The Complex solution, cosx+i∗sinxcos{x} + i*sin{x} necessitates not only that the reaction products are sinusoidal, the reactants must also be sinusoidal. I’m back to where I started: there are no “particles”, only waves
Personal theory development is not allowed at the PF. Please check your PMs; thread will remain closed. Thank you everyone for your contributions to the thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K