Can Flat Space Experiments simulate the Big Bang?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using flat space experiments to simulate conditions of the Big Bang, particularly focusing on the implications of the universe's current flatness on experimental observations and theoretical models. Participants explore the relevance of particle physics in early universe conditions and the limitations of current experimental capabilities in replicating singularities or the Big Bang itself.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether experiments can accurately reflect conditions of the early universe, noting that current measurements are significantly larger than those in the tightly curved universe of the Big Bang.
  • Another participant argues that flat spacetime does not significantly hinder experiments, suggesting that the primary challenge lies in the lack of a comprehensive theory of the Big Bang itself.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of particle physics to the early universe, with questions about whether spacetime symmetries influence particle properties and fundamental constants.
  • A participant highlights the limitations of current experiments, such as the LHC, in reaching energies comparable to the Planck scale, indicating that while we can approach conditions similar to the Big Bang, we remain within the realm of flat space and classical relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of flat spacetime on experimental simulations of the Big Bang, with some suggesting it is a significant barrier while others believe it is not. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which current experiments can replicate early universe conditions and the relevance of particle physics at those scales.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the uncertainty surrounding the nature of singularities and the Big Bang, as well as the limitations of current theories and experimental capabilities. There is also mention of ongoing discussions about spacetime rips and tears, which may relate to the conditions of the Big Bang.

friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
I'm wondering, now that the universe has expanded and is now pretty much flat, can any experiment we do tell us what might have happened during the Big Bang, when the universe was still small and tightly curved? It doesn't sound like the same situation. The results we get today travel meters or inches to the detectors, which is still very large compared to the very early universe. Would the same things result in a universe that is tightly curled up? If not, how far back can we go before we are no longer comparing apples to apples? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't personally think any experiments we can do today are especially hindered because the universe is flat. If it were tightly wound up like early in the universe at the big bang so far it appears nothing we know can exist.

There are lots more obstacles to creating a big bang than flat spacetime. The biggest obstacle is that no one knows or even has a theory about what the big bang is...only theories about what happened once it started...we even know is space and time were 'observables' at the start (whether they were separate entities or not).

Another way to ask your question is "Can we produce singularities" or can we observe them...so far the answer seems "no",,,but perhaps tiny black holes will be within our experimental capability...but whether we can observe what's inside the horizon is one of those "obstacles".

There is an active thread currently about rips and tears spacetime ...they MIGHT be such that that are similar to a big bang or black hole singularity...nobody knows if they exist...

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=391606&highlight=spacetime+rips
 
Last edited:
So what I guess I'm asking is at what size of the universe is particle physics relevant? Is particle physics, even in it virtual form, relevant all the way back to the singularity? I'm wondering if the flatness of present spacetime have some influence on the type of particles we can possibly see. Does spacetime symmetries determine particle properties, conservation laws, speed of light, gravitational constants, etc?
 
I think the confusion is caused by "LHC simulates big bang" or something like that.

One could say that it's possible to get a little closer to the big bang, but if you compare the LHC center-of-mass energy of (currently) 7 TeV with the Planck energy you will find that it's still a long way to go :-)

O know a very crude estimation in the context of LQC which shows that QG effects become small at approx. 100 * Planck length. That means that with the LHC we come closer to the big bang, but we are still in domain where flat space and classical relativity do apply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K