Can I-(aq) Be Oxidized by Air Oxygen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lightarrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the oxidation of iodide ions (I-) by oxygen in air, exploring the thermodynamics of the reaction and the states of matter involved. Participants analyze the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) for the reaction and its spontaneity under different conditions, including temperature and phase of iodine produced.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates ΔG for the reaction 4I-(aq) + O2 + 2H2O → 2I2 + 4OH-(aq) as -105.67 kJ/mol, suggesting the reaction should occur.
  • Another participant questions the phase of iodine in the products, noting that assuming iodine is in the vapor phase could lead to different thermodynamic values, while their calculations assume solid iodine, resulting in a ΔG of +51.58 kJ, indicating non-spontaneity at room temperature.
  • Concerns are raised about the dependence of the reaction on the concentration of reactants and products, suggesting that the reaction may not be a reliable method for producing iodine.
  • Some participants propose that the correct reaction should involve the formation of I3- instead of I2, with a revised equation including acid as a reactant: 6I-(aq) + 4H+(aq) + O2 → 2I3- + 2H2O.
  • One participant acknowledges that their initial computation was simplistic and that evaluating the reaction's ΔG is more complex than initially thought.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the phase of iodine and the correct stoichiometry of the reaction, leading to multiple competing interpretations of the thermodynamic data. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accurate representation of the reaction and its spontaneity.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of the state of matter for iodine and the role of concentrations in determining the reaction's feasibility. There are also references to the relative nature of entropy values for substances in solution, which may affect calculations.

lightarrow
Messages
1,966
Reaction score
64
[tex]4I^-(aq) + O_2 + 2H_2O \rightarrow 2I_2 + 4OH^-(aq)[/tex]

According to Atkins - Physical chemistry - fifth edition:

[tex]\Delta G^0_f(I^-aq)\ =\ -51.57\ kJmol^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta G^0_f(OH^-aq)\ =\ -157.24\ kJmol^{-1}[/tex]

So:

[tex]\Delta G^0_{reaction}\ =\ -105.67\ kJmol^{-1}[/tex]

and the reaction should really happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I have worked it again, and one of us still must be making a mistake somewhere since I have come up with a different answer.

What state of matter did you assume the Iodine to be in on the product side of the reaction? I have, previously, been assuming it to be in the vapor phase since this theoretical reaction called for the Iodide salt to be mildly heating causing the Iodine to sublime (also, Iodine vapor would have a higher entropy and would help drive the reaction forward if it did proceed).
For the below calculations, I assumed the Iodine to be in the solid phase.

Using my thero-table, I calculate that,
ΔH = -127.54 kJ
ΔS = -600.84 J
ΔG = +51.58 kJ

If, if I calculate ΔG manually as,
ΔG = ΔH – T * ΔS, for T = 298.15 Kelvin (25 °C), I get,
ΔG = +51.6 kJ,
which is awfully close to the value I get from the standard values in the table.

Assuming my calculations are correct, the reaction is not spontaneous at room temperature, however it does become spontaneous upon lowering the temperature to 212 Kelvin (about -60 °C).
 
mrjeffy321 said:
Well, I have worked it again, and one of us still must be making a mistake somewhere since I have come up with a different answer.

What state of matter did you assume the Iodine to be in on the product side of the reaction? I have, previously, been assuming it to be in the vapor phase since this theoretical reaction called for the Iodide salt to be mildly heating causing the Iodine to sublime (also, Iodine vapor would have a higher entropy and would help drive the reaction forward if it did proceed).
For the below calculations, I assumed the Iodine to be in the solid phase.

Using my thero-table, I calculate that,
ΔH = -127.54 kJ
ΔS = -600.84 J
ΔG = +51.58 kJ

If, if I calculate ΔG manually as,
ΔG = ΔH – T * ΔS, for T = 298.15 Kelvin (25 °C), I get,
ΔG = +51.6 kJ,
which is awfully close to the value I get from the standard values in the table.

Assuming my calculations are correct, the reaction is not spontaneous at room temperature, however it does become spontaneous upon lowering the temperature to 212 Kelvin (about -60 °C).

How do you get that value for ΔS?
Remember that for substances in solution, entropies are not given as absolute values, but only as relative values, with respect to

[tex]H^+(aq)[/tex]

to which is conventionally given the value 0 for entropy .
 
I believed that the reaction does really depends on the concentration of both sides..
anyway, this reaction should not be a general way to make I2...
 
lightarrow said:
[tex]4I^-(aq) + O_2 + 2H_2O \rightarrow 2I_2 + 4OH^-(aq)[/tex]

According to Atkins - Physical chemistry - fifth edition:

[tex]\Delta G^0_f(I^-aq)\ =\ -51.57\ kJmol^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta G^0_f(OH^-aq)\ =\ -157.24\ kJmol^{-1}[/tex]

So:

[tex]\Delta G^0_{reaction}\ =\ -105.67\ kJmol^{-1}[/tex]

and the reaction should really happen.

I agree but your reaction should show the acid as a reactant and the water it forms with OH-. I2 is not formed but I3- is. Your calculations are therefore a bit off. Anyone who has done an iodine titration knows from experience that acidic solutions of I- slowly produce I3- at room temperature... no calculus required.
 
chemisttree said:
I agree but your reaction should show the acid as a reactant and the water it forms with OH-. I2 is not formed but I3- is.
Yes, you're right, the correct equation, in solution, should be written as:

[tex]6I^-(aq) + 4H^+(aq) + O_2\rightarrow 2I_3^- + 2H_2O[/tex]
Your calculations are therefore a bit off. Anyone who has done an iodine titration knows from experience that acidic solutions of I- slowly produce I3- at room temperature... no calculus required.
Certainly. My intention was to discuss, as in the previous thread ( Making iodine from potassium iodide and...), the possibility to get iodine vapours by heating a wet, acidified alcaline iodide in presence of air oxigen, so I3- would give off I2 molecules and I- would stay in the solid phase.
But my computation was quite simplicistic, the reaction ΔG is clearly more difficult to evaluate than what I previously thought.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
32K
Replies
4
Views
14K