Can I obtain the inverse Laplace transform using complex analysis?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on obtaining the inverse Laplace transform of the function e^{-5s}/(s^2-4) using complex analysis. The initial calculation yields f(t) = (1/4)e^{2(t-5)} - (1/4)e^{-2(t-5)}, which is incorrect. The correct result should include the Heaviside function, f(t) = θ(t-5)((1/4)e^{2(t-5)} - (1/4)e^{-2(t-5)}), indicating the importance of the Heaviside function in the solution. The error arises because the limit condition for applying residue theory is not satisfied for t < 5. The discussion seeks clarification on how to properly apply complex analysis to achieve the correct result.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
1. Find inverse Laplace transform
[tex]\mathcal{L}^{-1}[\frac{e^{-5s}}{s^2-4}][/tex]
Relevant Equations
Inverse Laplace transform can be calculated as sum of residues of ##F(s)e^{st}##.
[tex]\mathcal{L}^{-1}[F(s)]=\sum^n_{k=1}Res[F(s)e^{st},s=\alpha_k][/tex]
\mathcal{L}^{-1}[\frac{e^{-5s}}{s^2-4}]=Res[e^{-5s}\frac{1}{s^2-4}e^{st},s=2]+Res[e^{-5s}\frac{1}{s^2-4}e^{st},s=-2]
From that I am getting
f(t)=\frac{1}{4}e^{2(t-5)}-\frac{1}{4}e^{-2(t-5)}. And this is not correct. Result should be
f(t)=\theta(t-5)(\frac{1}{4}e^{2(t-5)}-\frac{1}{4}e^{-2(t-5)})
where ##\theta## is Heaviside function. Where is the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
Homework Statement:: 1. Find inverse Laplace transform
\mathcal{L}^{-1}[\frac{e^{-5s}}{s^2-4}]
Relevant Equations:: Inverse Laplace transform can be calculated as sum of residues of ##F(s)e^{st}##.

This is only valid if \lim_{\operatorname{Re}(s) \to -\infty} F(s)e^{st} = 0. That is not the case for t &lt; 5.
 
  • Like
Likes LagrangeEuler
Thank you. Is it a way to show this somehow? Or to use some version of complex analysis to get this?
 
So my mine question, in this case, is can I somehow obtain this result using complex analysis?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
897
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K