Can I state that a of n is decreasing w/o taking the derivative

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions necessary for applying the alternating series test, particularly focusing on whether one can assert that the sequence \( a_n \) is decreasing without taking the derivative. Participants explore the implications of sequences approaching zero and the necessity of demonstrating that the terms are decreasing.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the limit of the absolute value of \( a_n \) approaches zero and \( a_n \) is positive for sufficiently large \( n \), this could imply that \( a_n \) is decreasing without needing to take the derivative.
  • Another participant provides a counterexample with \( a_{2n+1} = \frac{1}{(2n+1)^2} \) and \( a_{2n} = \frac{1}{2n} \), arguing that even if the terms approach zero, the sequence is not necessarily decreasing, thus the series may not converge.
  • A later reply emphasizes that one cannot assume a sequence of positive terms converging to zero does so in a decreasing manner, highlighting the rarity of such sequences.
  • There is a suggestion that using derivatives is a reliable method to demonstrate that a sequence is decreasing, despite it seeming like unnecessary work to some participants.
  • One participant questions whether their reasoning should always apply for series represented as a single function, but this is met with a negative response, indicating that exceptions exist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the necessity of demonstrating that \( a_n \) is decreasing. Some argue that it can be inferred under certain conditions, while others assert that this assumption is not valid in general.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that demonstrating a sequence is decreasing can be challenging and that reliance on derivatives is a common approach taught in class. There is an acknowledgment of the limitations of reasoning based solely on convergence to zero without further checks.

freshman2013
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
This applies to the alternating series test, and one of the conditions for it to work is if absolute value of an is decreasing for all n. The way the book says to do it is to take the derivative of f(x) with f(x)=an. However, if I know that the limit as n approaches infinity abs value an approaches 0, and that an (w/o the (-1)^n part) is positive for all n>N, shouldn't that enough to prove that an is decreasing to infinity. All the examples I did seem to follow this reasoning. Example: (-1)^(n-3)* sqrt(n)/(n+4). Clearly, if n is a really big positive number, then sqrt(n)/(n+4) can't be negative and the limit as it goes to infinity zero. Then the only way I can see it approaching zero is by decreasing. Might there be exceptions to this case and if so give an example? The only reason I'm asking this is that taking the derivative seems like unnecessary work to me. If I explain this on a test instead of taking a derivative, might the professor have any reason to takes points off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider
[tex]a_{2n+1} = \frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}[/tex]
and
[tex]a_{2n} = \frac{1}{2n}[/tex]

Then
[tex]\sum (-1)^n a_n[/tex]
is an alternating series, the terms are going to zero, but the series does not converge because the a2n terms are way bigger than the a2n+1 terms and the sequence is not decreasing term by term. It is generally true that if the an are given as a single rational function then if they're going to zero they will do so uniformly, but it's better not to make assumptions and just make the extra check.
 
So for series represented as one function, my reasoning should always work?
 
freshman2013 said:
So for series represented as one function, my reasoning should always work?

No. ##a_n=\frac{\cos^2(n\pi/2)}{n}##.

In order to use the Alternating Series Test, you must demonstrate that the sequence in question is decreasing to zero. If you don't want to do that, then you can't use the AST.

You cannot assume that a sequence of positive terms that converges to zero does so in a decreasing fashion, because that is not true in general. I know it seems like the "bad" kind of sequences must be exotic, but it's actually the "good" sequences that are rare.

In general, it can be difficult to show that a sequence is decreasing. Be grateful that you have been given such a powerful and easy-to-use tool as the derivative to help you out in some cases. It may seem like a lot of work, but I promise you it's one of the more straightforward ways of getting the job done.

I think the bottom line here is that come quiz/exam time, you should probably just do the problems using the tools that you were given in class. Keep in mind that, in addition to testing your understanding of new material, some assessments are designed to make sure you are still competent in the old material too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K