Can I use this formula to simplify my summations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luongo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying summations in mathematical expressions, specifically using the formula for multiplying summations. The user demonstrates the transformation of the summation by changing the index variable from 'k' to 'j', resulting in the expression \(\sum_{k=1}^{N_1} \sum_{j=1}^{N_2} f(k)g(j)\). This approach confirms that the choice of dummy variable does not affect the outcome of the summation, allowing for flexibility in notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of summation notation and dummy variables
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation of summations
  • Knowledge of functions and their representations in summation form
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and justifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of summation and how to manipulate them
  • Learn about dummy variables in mathematical expressions
  • Explore advanced summation techniques, such as generating functions
  • Investigate applications of summation in calculus and discrete mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics courses, educators teaching algebra and calculus, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of summation techniques and mathematical proofs.

Luongo
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
1. on #1 c) of the homework:
http://www.math.ubc.ca/~oyilmaz/courses/m267/hmk3.pdf
how do i multiply this summation?




Homework Equations





3. what i did was i multiplied the 2 expos and made on of the k indexes a 'm' instead and i got [tex]\sum e<sup>i(k+m)t</sup>[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\left( \sum_{k =1}^{N_1} f(k) \right) \left( \sum_{j=1}^{N_2} g(j) \right) = \sum_{k=1}^{N_1} \sum_{j=1}^{N_2} f(k)g(j)[/tex]

Can you try to see why the above is true?

Now in your problem, k is a dummy variable (meaning, that since it sums over, it doesn't matter if we call it k, or j). So we can replace the variable in the second summation, by j. Then you can apply the above formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K