Can Internet Security Ever Match the Safety of Physical Systems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inherent vulnerabilities of electronic and internet systems compared to physical systems, emphasizing the increasing severity of cyber threats as reliance on digital infrastructure grows. Key points include Richard Clarke's three laws of cybersecurity, which highlight the risks associated with computer usage. The conversation also touches on the military's separate networks and the potential for internal breaches, as well as the importance of understanding how systems are compromised, whether through software vulnerabilities or social engineering. The consensus is that while some systems can be secure, many popular operating systems are not adequately protected against sophisticated attacks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cybersecurity principles and practices
  • Familiarity with Richard Clarke's "Cyber War: What It Is and How to Fight It"
  • Knowledge of operating system vulnerabilities and security measures
  • Awareness of social engineering tactics used in cyber attacks
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced cybersecurity frameworks and best practices
  • Explore the implications of military cybersecurity networks and their vulnerabilities
  • Study social engineering techniques and how to mitigate them
  • Learn about the security features of less common operating systems that may offer better protection
USEFUL FOR

Cybersecurity professionals, military IT personnel, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of internet security and the challenges posed by cyber threats.

GRB 080319B
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/06/10/60minutes/main6568387.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZUzB8uC9bs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FZUzB8uC9bs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/R-qudlJDqmU&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/R-qudlJDqmU&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Can electronic/internet systems ever be as secure as physical systems? Seeing how easily http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14825465/" carried out by hackers, its seems that the current electronic/internet systems are repleat with flagrent security vulnerabilities I know there has been monetary and information theft before the advent of the internet, but it seems like these incidents have become increasingly more common and with increasing severity as the world becomes more dependent on these network systems. Have corporations/governments become complacent with these threats, seeing them as a "necessary evils", to remain connected through the internet? If so, is there any pragmatic solution to this fundamental problem of internet security?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
good god this is scary. TB's of data stolen wow
 
Cyber War: What It Is and How to Fight It, Richard Clarke

http://www.booktv.org/Program/11562/Cyber+War+What+It+Is+and+How+to+Fight+It.aspx

34 minutes 10 seconds into that he gives the three laws of cyber security:
1: Don't have a computer.
2: If you have to have a computer, don't turn it on.
3: If you have to have a computer and you have to turn it on, don't plug it into anything, like the internet.
 
From my Naval Systems Security course:

"The best computer protection is only as good as its user."
 
why don't they not connect to the internet lol, so remote access is impossible.
Would it be possible for the Military to create there own country wide network. But then that could get hacked from within the military
 
SpartanG345 said:
why don't they not connect to the internet lol, so remote access is impossible.
Would it be possible for the Military to create there own country wide network. But then that could get hacked from within the military

The military does have separate networks. Hacking them isn't the biggest concern - those networks are more vulnerable to incidents like the Wikileaks incident that occurred this week.
 
One thing I was wondering throughout the videos was how was these systems being compromised? Were the attackers using vulnerabilities in the OS, or software that was being used? Were the attackers using social engineering techniques to get information? I had no idea about the previous attacks that caused power outages. That is a scary thought.
 
As with everything within hacking:

- You can hack system "X" if there is a hole that allows system "X" to be hacked.
- Since we are humans, system "X" will almost always be open to a dedicated hacker (pref: "cracker").
- We can protect system "X" but we need to be ahead of the game.
 
newtech said:
One thing I was wondering throughout the videos was how was these systems being compromised? Were the attackers using vulnerabilities in the OS, or software that was being used? Were the attackers using social engineering techniques to get information? I had no idea about the previous attacks that caused power outages. That is a scary thought.

One possible method of intrusion:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20013545-245.html?tag=topStories2"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Bottom line is that its all about 1's and 0's. A system is only as complicated and secure as the human brain that made it. "If it is made, it can be broken".
 
  • #11
http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/stuxnet-introduces-first-known-rootkit-scada-devices"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Svensken said:
As with everything within hacking:

- You can hack system "X" if there is a hole that allows system "X" to be hacked.
- Since we are humans, system "X" will almost always be open to a dedicated hacker (pref: "cracker").
- We can protect system "X" but we need to be ahead of the game.

Well said, and I'm glad you said it, as many people believe both all OSes and all encryption can be hacked.

Not so.

Just as one-time-pads cannot be cracked provided the pad is sufficiently random, certain operation systems employing the proper techniques are similarly beyond reproach.

Sadly, Microsoft's, Apple's, Unixes, and most of the other common ones aren't among them.
 
  • #13
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45199096/ns/technology_and_science-security/t/cyber-weaknesses-should-deter-us-waging-war/"

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-foreign-cyber-infrastructure-expert.html"

This is arguably the first case where we have had a hack of critical infrastructure from outside the United States that caused damage
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K