High School Can Lasers Really Create a Functional Light Saber?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pete94857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force components
Click For Summary
Using the inverse square law, it is theoretically possible to create a light saber-like effect using thousands of micro lasers arranged side by side to form a coherent beam. However, this approach would not produce a true light saber as depicted in movies. The discussion highlights that while a single laser beam can be extended infinitely with diminishing strength, this method is overly complex. For more practical applications of coordinated light sources, concepts like phased array radar and Huygen’s wavelets are suggested. The thread concludes that the initial premise is based on a misunderstanding of laser technology.
pete94857
Messages
99
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Mirco lasers, inverse square law.
I believe using the inverse square law it would be possible to produce a light saber made from lasers. By placing thousands of micro laser side by side a limited length beam could be formed but the combined energy would produce a seemingly single beam with the total energy accumulated from all the micro lasers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That won’t make a light saber (if by that you mean something like from the movies). Arrange your lasers properly and we can get a single laser beam extending out to infinity and weakening according to the inverse square law, but that’s just a single laser done in an unnecessarily complicated and difficult way.

For a more interesting application of multiple coordinated light sources, you might try reading about how phased array radar beams are steered, and also learn about “Huygen’s wavelets” which will be the general principle behind all such arrangements of light sources.

This thread is closed, as it based on a misunderstanding.
 
  • Like
Likes pete94857, DaveE, berkeman and 1 other person
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K