Can Limits and Simple Functions Approximate Extended Real Functions?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
wayneckm
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hello all,


I have a few questions in my mind:

1) [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}[0,n) = \cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}[0,n) = [0,infty)[/tex] holds, and for [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}[0,n] = \cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}[0,n] = [0,infty)[/tex] is also true? It should not be [tex][0,infty][/tex], am I correct?

2) Consider an extended real function [tex]f[/tex], if we use simple function [tex]f_{n} = f 1_{f\leq n}[/tex], by taking limit, we can only have it approximated to [tex]f 1_{f < \infty}[/tex] but since [tex]f[/tex] may take [tex]\infty[/tex], such simple function may not be approximating [tex]f[/tex] almost everywhere unless [tex]f = \infty[/tex] is of measure 0?

Am I correct? Thanks.


Wayne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Help me out here. What does
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}[0,n)[/tex]
mean? Or were you just defining it as
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}[0,n) := \cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}[0,n)\?[/tex]
 
the symbol 1 here means the indicator function.

Thanks.