Can liquids be treated as rigid bodies for moment of inertia

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether liquids can be treated as rigid bodies when calculating the moment of inertia, particularly in the context of a partially filled bottle of water tipping over. Participants explore the implications of fluid dynamics, angular acceleration, and the changing mass distribution of the liquid as it moves.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that at a given instant, the liquid in a tipping bottle can be treated as having a moment of inertia similar to that of a rigid body of the same shape.
  • Others argue that the moment of inertia of the liquid changes as it falls, depending on its instantaneous mass distribution.
  • One participant contends that if a torque is applied to the bottle and the liquid does not accelerate, the liquid should not be included in the moment of inertia calculation.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that rigidity does not factor into the moment of inertia, emphasizing that only mass distribution is relevant.
  • Some participants highlight the complexity of modeling the liquid's behavior, noting that different parts of the liquid may accelerate at different rates, complicating the treatment as a single object.
  • There is a suggestion that if the liquid were very viscous, it might be more reasonable to treat it as part of the system, but this is not the case in the current scenario.
  • A later reply indicates that to determine the angular acceleration of the bottle, one should consider the moment of inertia of the bottle separately from the water, acknowledging the complexities involved in modeling the fluid dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the liquid can be treated as a rigid body for the purpose of calculating moment of inertia. Multiple competing views remain regarding the treatment of the liquid's dynamics in relation to the bottle's motion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in modeling fluid behavior, including the dependence on assumptions about viscosity, the complexity of fluid dynamics, and the changing shape of the liquid as it moves.

Philip17
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Consider a partially filled bottle of water. When it's tipped over and rotating about its pivot point where its edge touches the ground, it has an angular acceleration. Assuming the liquid is not viscous at all, so flows perfectly, at a given instant can it be considered to have a moment of inertia equal to that of a rigid body of the same shape? Could its angular acceleration thus be calculated using this moment of inertia and its instantaneous center of mass? This would mean that its moment of inertia changes as it falls.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philip17 said:
This would mean that its moment of inertia changes as it falls.

It will. The instantaneous moment of inertia is the moment of inertia of the mass distribution at that instant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip17
Vanadium 50 said:
It will. The instantaneous moment of inertia is the moment of inertia of the mass distribution at that instant.
As if it were a rigid body at that instant, right?
 
No
If you can apply a torque to the bottle, and accelerate the bottle without accelerating the liquid inside the the liquid should not be included in the moment of inertia.

Take the simpler example of a round tub containing a hypothetical non viscous, friction-less fluid. If you apply a torque to the tub, the tub will accelerate, but the fluid will remain stationary. Since you did not accelerate the fluid you have not added any angular momentum to it and so it is not included in the tubs moment of inertia.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip17
mrspeedybob said:
No
If you can apply a torque to the bottle, and accelerate the bottle without accelerating the liquid inside the the liquid should not be included in the moment of inertia.

Take the simpler example of a round tub containing a hypothetical non viscous, friction-less fluid. If you apply a torque to the tub, the tub will accelerate, but the fluid will remain stationary. Since you did not accelerate the fluid you have not added any angular momentum to it and so it is not included in the tubs moment of inertia.
But in this case the water would have to accelerate. Wouldn't it?
Does that mean the moment of inertia for the water should be ignored when the bottle is falling over?
 
Rigidity is not something that enters into the moment of inertia. Only the mass distribution matters.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip17
Vanadium 50 said:
Rigidity is not something that enters into the moment of inertia. Only the mass distribution matters.
So, just to clarify:
In order to determine the instantaneous angular acceleration of a half-filled bottle of water tipping over - i.e. rotating about the point where it touches the table - I use the moment of inertia for a rigid body with the same instantaneous shape as the water (which will change) (1)
or
Do i simply assume the moment of inertia for the whole system is that of the bottle and ignore the water? (2)

(1) or (2)? Thank you very much by that way :)
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Rigidity is not something that enters into the moment of inertia. Only the mass distribution matters.

Yes, but the mass distribution of what? When the different parts of an object accelerate at different rates then it no longer makes sense to model it as a single simple object. In my example you would clearly only use the moment of the tub because the liquid is not part of the object that is being accelerated. If the liquid were very viscous then treating it as part of the tub would be logical. Philip17's example is between those 2 extremes and is going to be quite difficult to model.
 
Philip17 said:
So, just to clarify:
In order to determine the instantaneous angular acceleration of a half-filled bottle of water tipping over - i.e. rotating about the point where it touches the table - I use the moment of inertia for a rigid body with the same instantaneous shape as the water (which will change) (1)
or
Do i simply assume the moment of inertia for the whole system is that of the bottle and ignore the water? (2)

(1) or (2)? Thank you very much by that way :)

Neither.
The bottle will be experiencing angular acceleration, therefore you should use the moment of inertia for the bottle as a separate object from the water.
The water will be experiencing some angular acceleration due to it's friction with the bottle, some linear acceleration toward the down-tipping end of the bottle, some deformation as the fluid changes shape, some internal friction resisting the change in shape, etc. modeling the water is going to be a rather complex fluid dynamics problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K