Can liquids be treated as rigid bodies for moment of inertia

In summary, when a partially filled bottle of water is tipped over and rotating about its pivot point on the ground, it will experience angular acceleration. The moment of inertia for the bottle should be used as a separate object from the water, as the water will experience its own angular acceleration and complex fluid dynamics. The moment of inertia for the water should not be ignored, but rather modeled separately from the bottle.
  • #1
Philip17
4
0
Consider a partially filled bottle of water. When it's tipped over and rotating about its pivot point where its edge touches the ground, it has an angular acceleration. Assuming the liquid is not viscous at all, so flows perfectly, at a given instant can it be considered to have a moment of inertia equal to that of a rigid body of the same shape? Could its angular acceleration thus be calculated using this moment of inertia and its instantaneous center of mass? This would mean that its moment of inertia changes as it falls.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Philip17 said:
This would mean that its moment of inertia changes as it falls.

It will. The instantaneous moment of inertia is the moment of inertia of the mass distribution at that instant.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip17
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
It will. The instantaneous moment of inertia is the moment of inertia of the mass distribution at that instant.
As if it were a rigid body at that instant, right?
 
  • #4
No
If you can apply a torque to the bottle, and accelerate the bottle without accelerating the liquid inside the the liquid should not be included in the moment of inertia.

Take the simpler example of a round tub containing a hypothetical non viscous, friction-less fluid. If you apply a torque to the tub, the tub will accelerate, but the fluid will remain stationary. Since you did not accelerate the fluid you have not added any angular momentum to it and so it is not included in the tubs moment of inertia.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip17
  • #5
mrspeedybob said:
No
If you can apply a torque to the bottle, and accelerate the bottle without accelerating the liquid inside the the liquid should not be included in the moment of inertia.

Take the simpler example of a round tub containing a hypothetical non viscous, friction-less fluid. If you apply a torque to the tub, the tub will accelerate, but the fluid will remain stationary. Since you did not accelerate the fluid you have not added any angular momentum to it and so it is not included in the tubs moment of inertia.
But in this case the water would have to accelerate. Wouldn't it?
Does that mean the moment of inertia for the water should be ignored when the bottle is falling over?
 
  • #6
Rigidity is not something that enters into the moment of inertia. Only the mass distribution matters.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip17
  • #7
Vanadium 50 said:
Rigidity is not something that enters into the moment of inertia. Only the mass distribution matters.
So, just to clarify:
In order to determine the instantaneous angular acceleration of a half-filled bottle of water tipping over - i.e. rotating about the point where it touches the table - I use the moment of inertia for a rigid body with the same instantaneous shape as the water (which will change) (1)
or
Do i simply assume the moment of inertia for the whole system is that of the bottle and ignore the water? (2)

(1) or (2)? Thank you very much by that way :)
 
  • #8
Vanadium 50 said:
Rigidity is not something that enters into the moment of inertia. Only the mass distribution matters.

Yes, but the mass distribution of what? When the different parts of an object accelerate at different rates then it no longer makes sense to model it as a single simple object. In my example you would clearly only use the moment of the tub because the liquid is not part of the object that is being accelerated. If the liquid were very viscous then treating it as part of the tub would be logical. Philip17's example is between those 2 extremes and is going to be quite difficult to model.
 
  • #9
Philip17 said:
So, just to clarify:
In order to determine the instantaneous angular acceleration of a half-filled bottle of water tipping over - i.e. rotating about the point where it touches the table - I use the moment of inertia for a rigid body with the same instantaneous shape as the water (which will change) (1)
or
Do i simply assume the moment of inertia for the whole system is that of the bottle and ignore the water? (2)

(1) or (2)? Thank you very much by that way :)

Neither.
The bottle will be experiencing angular acceleration, therefore you should use the moment of inertia for the bottle as a separate object from the water.
The water will be experiencing some angular acceleration due to it's friction with the bottle, some linear acceleration toward the down-tipping end of the bottle, some deformation as the fluid changes shape, some internal friction resisting the change in shape, etc. modeling the water is going to be a rather complex fluid dynamics problem.
 

1. Can all liquids be treated as rigid bodies for moment of inertia?

Yes, all liquids can be treated as rigid bodies for moment of inertia, as long as they are contained in a closed system and not affected by external forces.

2. How is the moment of inertia of a liquid calculated?

The moment of inertia of a liquid can be calculated using the formula I = ρVr², where ρ is the density of the liquid, V is the volume of the liquid, and r is the distance from the axis of rotation.

3. Is the moment of inertia of a liquid affected by its shape?

Yes, the moment of inertia of a liquid is affected by its shape. The more spread out the mass of the liquid is, the greater the moment of inertia will be.

4. Can the moment of inertia of a liquid change?

Yes, the moment of inertia of a liquid can change if the shape or distribution of its mass changes. This can happen if the liquid is heated, cooled, or if its container is rotated.

5. Why is it important to consider the moment of inertia of a liquid?

The moment of inertia of a liquid is important because it affects its rotational motion. This is especially important in engineering and physics applications where the behavior of rotating objects needs to be accurately predicted.

Similar threads

Replies
69
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
864
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
901
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
921
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
Back
Top