- 8,213
- 2,651
A recent introduction to algae from the DOE.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxyvVkeW7Nk
http://energy.gov/search/site/algae?gid=79
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxyvVkeW7Nk
http://energy.gov/search/site/algae?gid=79
RICHLAND, Wash. – Engineers have created a continuous chemical process that produces useful crude oil minutes after they pour in harvested algae — a verdant green paste with the consistency of pea soup.
The research by engineers at the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was reported recently in the journal Algal Research. A biofuels company, Utah-based Genifuel Corp., has licensed the technology and is working with an industrial partner to build a pilot plant using the technology.
Astronuc said:
Algae Harvesting: a continuous flow ‘wet harvest’ system to efficiently dewater and concentrate the microscopic algae harvest. The process can deliver a concentrate with the algae cells substantially intact, or ruptured, as desired.
EWS has been successfully tested on many algae strains, including Botryococcus brauneii, Haematococcus pluvialis, Nannochloropsis sp., Tetraselmis sp., Chlorella sp., Scenedesmus dimorphus and more.
EWS systems testing has been validated to effectively remove harmful invaders and pathogens such as bacteria, rotifers, ciliates, protozoa, amoeba and parasites.
Read more: http://www.originoil.com/products/algae-processing#ixzz390BROYES
http://www.sapphireenergy.com/news-article/799644-algae-fueled-motorcycle-sets-speed-recordIn a project entitled One Barrel for Baja, Gustavson led a team of UCSD students to make a portion of the biofuel themselves under the supervision of Dr. B. Greg Mitchell’s Scripps Photobiology Group, with assistance from the San Diego Center for Algal Biotechnology. The students grew and harvested algae using a sponsored Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) unit supplied by World Water Works from ponds at the Carbon Capture Corporation’s facility near the Salton Sea and at a greenhouse facility on the university’s campus.
After the algae harvest, its biomass was isolated and sent to Dr. Skip Pomeroy’s Laboratory at UCSD. In the laboratory, the lipids and fats were then extracted and further converted into usable diesel fuel by the Biofuels Action and Awareness Network.
Gustavson, a recent graduate of the Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation’s MAS Program at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, is a co-founder of Below the Surface, a nonprofit organization dedicated to exploring waterways and educating the public about issues pertaining to water. He started the One Barrel for Baja Project in order to synthesize enough algal biodiesel to compete in various speed trials and the grueling Baja 1000 race this fall (http://algae.ucsd.edu/Blog1/Blog-1-Baja.html ). Below the Surface is committed to finding solutions to pollution and believes that biofuels from algae can help reduce run-off going into America’s waterways.
http://www.wtok.com/home/headlines/Solaplast-Formulates-Plastic-out-of-Algae-282877561.htmlMeridian, Miss. It may seem different to one day be thinking that the plastic cup you are drinking out of was once algae floating on the surface of the water, but one company is hoping that's the case. Solaplast recently held a grand opening in the Sonny Montgomery Industrial Park in Meridian, and promises upwards to one hundred jobs at the facility over the next few years. What was research at the University of Georgia to make Biofuels from Algae, has now become a groundbreaking company in Meridian...![]()
klimatos said:My daughter was involved in an early biodiesel feasibility study. She claimed that the algae production stunk like you wouldn't believe. They had a problem with keeping production workers onsite and even the project manager was reluctant to visit the facility. The project was abandoned because nobody could tolerate the odor for very long.
Thank you. I was going to respond yesterday, but knew you'd have a much better answer.Ivan Seeking said:Odor is typically associated with bacterial contamination, which can be a problem if the system is not properly designed or maintained. But some strains can apparently produces strong odors even under ideal conditions. So odor control is a function of purity and maintenance well as strain selection. In my efforts, the green, fresh-water strain of algae, Botryococcus braunii, was used. Even though at the algae-water solution at harvest time was like pea soup, no odor we ever detectable less the faint odor of vitamins from the fertilizer. This includes a period of about six months of testing and four or five harvest cycles.
Bacterial, viral, and parasitic contamination are always a threat and drive many of the design considerations for large-scale farming. This can be especially challenging for waste remediation applications.
Live algae smells like freshly cut grass. Dead algae smells like rotting corpses.
B. braunii are notoriously slow growing despite the high percentage of lipid contents. Did "four or five harvest cycles" represent the entire harvest number in the six months work with the species? I was very pleased to hear that it was "like pea soup", since the DoE and DoA are currently running a competition to see if someone can concentrate a one gram per liter solution of algae into a 20% solids suspension, at something less than current industry capital and operating costs, therefore I would like to know, were you speaking of a post-concentration process thickness, or the raw batch after a month or more of cultivation? For that matter, with the high lipid content were the B. braunii predominantly floating on the surface of the growth medium, or were you using a churning dispersion method of solve the self-shadowing problem that prevented the natural floating buoyancy? (BTW, your knowledge of algae appears impressive based on what I have read from this thread.)Ivan Seeking said:Odor is typically associated with bacterial contamination, which can be a problem if the system is not properly designed or maintained. But some strains can apparently produces strong odors even under ideal conditions. So odor control is a function of purity and maintenance well as strain selection. In my efforts, the green, fresh-water strain of algae, Botryococcus braunii, was used. Even though at the algae-water solution at harvest time was like pea soup, no odor we ever detectable less the faint odor of vitamins from the fertilizer. This includes a period of about six months of testing and four or five harvest cycles.
Bacterial, viral, and parasitic contamination are always a threat and drive many of the design considerations for large-scale farming. This can be especially challenging for waste remediation applications.
Doc Williamon said:B. braunii are notoriously slow growing despite the high percentage of lipid contents. Did "four or five harvest cycles" represent the entire harvest number in the six months work with the species? I was very pleased to hear that it was "like pea soup", since the DoE and DoA are currently running a competition to see if someone can concentrate a one gram per liter solution of algae into a 20% solids suspension, at something less than current industry capital and operating costs, therefore I would like to know, were you speaking of a post-concentration process thickness, or the raw batch after a month or more of cultivation?
For that matter, with the high lipid content were the B. braunii predominantly floating on the surface of the growth medium, or were you using a churning dispersion method of solve the self-shadowing problem that prevented the natural floating buoyancy?
B.Braunii is worth investigating at the genetic level to see why it stores so much of its energy as lipids (i.e. 60 -70% some claim), but more for finding that gene that promotes the high percentage lipid energy storage than trying to grow the species as a significant source for lipids. Of course the opposite is true too, if you could substitute a fast growth gene for the one that causes B. braunii to grow so slowly, you would have a major winner there. Which leads me to my quest/major premise: forget the lipid content percentage, any old common algae will do, with 15 or 20% lipids (by weight) if it replicates 3 or 4 times a day. (some do, grow that fast, so I've read, but I don't remember anyone mentioning any specific species that does so - if you know, please share that information!) As you can readily see from the math, it only take a couple of days to outpace a "slow" growing high lipid content species. What people don't give sufficient "weight" to, is the fact that all those cells that are "only 20%" lipids are also producing 80% of a very nutritious blend of starches and proteins, i.e. food, or for that matter if you separate the starches from the proteins, then the starches are the main raw material ingredient for organic plastics, and the protein is very much like a soy protein substitute. This single minded approach of "how much fuel can we squeeze from this algae?" is turning a blind eye to the real potential of algae.Ivan Seeking said:I was running two bioreactors and had a few false starts. We had a hot early summer and I burned and cooked a few crops before getting the sunlight and temp under control. So in all I probably had 2 or 3 successful harvests per bioreactor over a period of about six months. And by December the growth has slowed to a crawl. But these were outside in a field, not in a lab.
wiki on Param Jaggi said:He is known for building Algae Mobile, a device that converts carbon dioxide emitted from a car into oxygen.
...
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2015/07/what-s-up-with-the-algae-biofuels-industry.htmlWhat’s Up with the Algae Biofuels Industry?
Six years after 2009’s “summer of algae”, we look at who’s doing what now, as the industry diversifies heavily into nutraceuticals in search of sustaining product revenue. 31 Algae players, what do they make now, and how are they making out?
Algae, algae, algae — biofuels made from and by the littleist creatures in the advanced bioeconomy is back in focus this week, as the DOE puts $18 million in funding into the marlet aimed at stimulating sub-$5 per gallon algae biofuels by 2019.
What are the current generation of algae technologies and companies up to? What are they making, and how are they making out, exactly? Here’s our company by company guide to 31 of the players on the scene — project developers and technology suppliers.
timallard said:The nutrients as $400/ton high-quality fertilizer are worth $8.3-million a day the metric that matters to replicate the value of the resource, this can only be done at treatment plants. .
timallard said:My first kudos back is engine designers need to do two basic biodiesel engines, the first runs with glycerol in the biodiesel the other not.
The other issue I've become aware of as being more important than anything else now for IC-engines is waste-heat, same for Steam-Age power plants.
timallard said:This is from dealing with sea-ice loss and direct heat gain there it's now global forcing of 0.21-watts/m^2, that's a lot. Now multiply the wattage of all the power plants in the world by 2 to get the Joules of waste-heat of direct warming because using steam for electrons is 40% thermally efficient, use 1/3, so burns twice the fuel per watt on the wire.
My stance is leave the Steam-Age burn boil nothing for watts the reason is waste-heat, it's far worse than re-emitted radiation on the short-term that matter more to the future than 20-years from now.Ivan Seeking said:I haven't thought this through completely but I think your concerns about heat are moot when it comes to carbon-neutral fuels. The heat energy released by burning the fuel was first absorbed from sunlight via photosynthesis - an endothermic reaction. So the heat generated by combustion is just delayed heating due to sunlight and would have occurred anyway. In the case of fossil fuels, the same applies, but that sun energy was absorbed millions of years ago.
Ironically, nuclear power creates new heat. The energy in nuclear power does not originate from sunlight, rather from the fusion reaction in some star somewhere, I guess.
timallard said:A more recent idea trying to quantify what a joule of heat-gain in albedo-loss is to the assumed cooling in emissions reductions to allow priorities on what matters as a solution that is the most bang.
Following that thought, this applies to any latitude & climate hot or cold thus a broad application to reduce waste-heat going into the sky, soils & water for all situations and applied locally with simple changes like do paint roofs white in a desert and don't use black tarmac, just don't do it
" The algae grows, dies, sinks to the bottom and is preserved by the low temperatures."Ivan Seeking said:By creating large algae blooms in the oceans, and possibly in deep lakes, we can create both large carbon sinks as well as thermal sinks. The algae grows, dies, sinks to the bottom and is preserved by the low temperatures. Again, all photosynthetic energy is trapped.
Also, thinking of the reefs, algae soaks up acids - nitric and carbonic acids. It would help to increase the pH of the water. One of the challenges in large-scale algae farming is keeping the pH low enough.
Some companies are planning to do this for the carbon credits to offset emissions from factories [as opposed to using CO2 remediation at the source].
timallard said:" The algae grows, dies, sinks to the bottom and is preserved by the low temperatures."
The problem here is anaerobic bacteria take over and create methane & CO2 down there, hydrogen-sulfide at the end of the global heating process where extinctions occurred.
Consider we have more electricity than we need by many times, our failure is to have strict engineering on heat-transfer so you don't convert forms of energy, if you need a comfy room using solar-thermal not watts, if you want to drive a car use that waste-heat to heat the house or hot-water for the house.
Being a designer for I did a line of spring-powered things wound up by windmills down to kitchen appliances for off-grid ... still makes sense, nobody funds ideas like that, they sell batteries .