Can Mu metals redirect a magnetic field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of Mu metals in redirecting magnetic fields to reduce the attraction between neodymium magnets. Participants confirm that Mu metals can effectively shield magnetic fields, but caution that using ferrous materials may inadvertently increase attraction. A U-shaped ferrous keeper is suggested as a potential solution, although its thickness must be sufficient to avoid saturation. The conversation also touches on the feasibility of using electromagnets to control magnetic repulsion dynamically.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field principles
  • Familiarity with neodymium magnets and their properties
  • Knowledge of Mu metals and their applications in magnetic shielding
  • Basic concepts of electromagnetism and electromagnets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Mu metals in magnetic shielding
  • Learn about the design and implementation of U-shaped ferrous keepers for magnets
  • Explore the use of electromagnets for controlling magnetic forces
  • Investigate the effects of saturation in ferromagnetic materials
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, hobbyists working with magnets, and anyone interested in magnetic field manipulation and shielding techniques.

DLeuPel
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
I am trying to find a way to decrease the force between two magnets by putting a physical barrier in the middle of them. I’ve reasearched and found that Mu metals redirect the flux of the magnetic fields so those two magnets shouldn’t have any noticeable attraction between them. Of course, before buying Mu metal, I would like to ask if will it work and is there another material that can do such a thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DLeuPel said:
I am trying to find a way to decrease the force between two magnets by putting a physical barrier in the middle of them. I’ve reasearched and found that Mu metals redirect the flux of the magnetic fields so those two magnets shouldn’t have any noticeable attraction between them. Of course, before buying Mu metal, I would like to ask if will it work and is there another material that can do such a thing?
What shape are the magnets? If horseshoe, just put a keeper on each of them...

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41Q2p4idMrL._SX342_.jpg

41Q2p4idMrL._SX342_.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 41Q2p4idMrL._SX342_.jpg
    41Q2p4idMrL._SX342_.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 1,124
What shape? Can you post a picture? You can use the UPLOAD button to add a PDF or JPEG file, or you can click the little painting icon to paste in a URL to a picture, like I did for the red magnet above. Also, can you show how the 2 magnets are arranged?

If you just put a piece of ferrous metal between the two magnets, it will likely increase their attractive force. You need to figure out a way to redirect each magnet's field so it closes between the two poles of each of the magnets without going near the other magnet...
 
berkeman said:
What shape? Can you post a picture? You can use the UPLOAD button to add a PDF or JPEG file, or you can click the little painting icon to paste in a URL to a picture, like I did for the red magnet above. Also, can you show how the 2 magnets are arranged?

If you just put a piece of ferrous metal between the two magnets, it will likely increase their attractive force. You need to figure out a way to redirect each magnet's field so it closes between the two poles of each of the magnets without going near the other magnet...
upload_2018-10-30_22-9-3.jpeg


I have one magnet laid down like the two magnets at the right, and a group of magnets ( like the one of the left of the image )on top of the singular magnet. Both interact with repelling forces and I need to put something in between so that those forces barely act on each other. Any ideas ?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-30_22-9-3.jpeg
    upload_2018-10-30_22-9-3.jpeg
    13.5 KB · Views: 795
So it looks like those magnets are magnetized axially (one flat face is N and the other flat face is S). To contain that B-field, you need a u-shaped piece of ferrous metal that you can slip over the top and bottom faces that fits fairly close to both, and has the two outer pieces connected along one or 3 of the sides. I couldn't find a picture of one, so hopefully that makes sense. If you only do that "keeper" for the bottom magnet and not the top stack, the top stack will be attracted to the ferrous keeper below it.

What spacing are you wanting between the bottom magnet and the top stack? Are you wanting to go from repelling to no force (other than the force of gravity on the top stack of magnets)? Are you wanting to basically turn "on and off" the repulsion? Would going from repulsion to attraction also work?

BTW, having the keeper that close to such a strong magnet will likely require a fairly thick keeper wall, to avoid saturation. Once the keeper material saturates, any B-field above the saturation level leaks past the keeper and will still interact with the other magnets.
 
berkeman said:
So it looks like those magnets are magnetized axially (one flat face is N and the other flat face is S). To contain that B-field, you need a u-shaped piece of ferrous metal that you can slip over the top and bottom faces that fits fairly close to both, and has the two outer pieces connected along one or 3 of the sides. I couldn't find a picture of one, so hopefully that makes sense. If you only do that "keeper" for the bottom magnet and not the top stack, the top stack will be attracted to the ferrous keeper below it.

What spacing are you wanting between the bottom magnet and the top stack? Are you wanting to go from repelling to no force (other than the force of gravity on the top stack of magnets)? Are you wanting to basically turn "on and off" the repulsion? Would going from repulsion to attraction also work?

BTW, having the keeper that close to such a strong magnet will likely require a fairly thick keeper wall, to avoid saturation. Once the keeper material saturates, any B-field above the saturation level leaks past the keeper and will still interact with the other magnets.
I’m hoping to turn on and off the repulsion. Basically put both magnets at a small distance ( 5-7 cm ) and from time to time, be able to put any material between and observe how there is no repulsion when the material is in between. My following question is does that ferrous metal which forms part of the keeper attract or repel the magnets? , because I’m trying to avoid it. Also, were could I get such a keeper? Thank beforehand for the help.
 
You may need to know that whatever solution you use (keeper or mumetal) it will take energy to put it between the magnets to "turn off the repulsion" as you put it. This energy might be similar to that required to simply turn one of the magnets around.

Aside: Many people try to make so called free energy or perpetual motion machines using magnets and shields in their design. They don't and can't work because magnetic force is a conservative force. Look it up on Wikipedia. In short it means that any system that returns to its starting condition (typically once per revolution) can't do any work. This is regardless of the path taken in the meantime. Its a bit like gravity. The potential energy between two points on a mountain depend only on the height difference not the path taken between them. Magnetic shields effectively only changes the path taken in the magnetic field so no shield design no matter how complicated can help make energy.
 
CWatters said:
You may need to know that whatever solution you use (keeper or mumetal) it will take energy to put it between the magnets to "turn off the repulsion" as you put it. This energy might be similar to that required to simply turn one of the magnets around.

Aside: Many people try to make so called free energy or perpetual motion machines using magnets and shields in their design. They don't and can't work because magnetic force is a conservative force. Look it up on Wikipedia. In short it means that any system that returns to its starting condition (typically once per revolution) can't do any work. This is regardless of the path taken in the meantime. Its a bit like gravity. The potential energy between two points on a mountain depend only on the height difference not the path taken between them. Magnetic shields effectively only changes the path taken in the magnetic field so no shield design no matter how complicated can help make energy.
That’s a good reply. Thank you.
 
  • #10
DLeuPel said:
I’m hoping to turn on and off the repulsion.
Sounds like one of the pieces should be an electromagnet, instead of them both being permanent magnets... :wink:
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
Sounds like one of the pieces should be an electromagnet, instead of them both being permanent magnets... :wink:
Haven’t thought about that. That’s definitely what I’m going to do. Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #12
I would do a patent search before you submit an application :-)
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Why does metal moving though a magnetic field slow down?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
High School Seeing both B field lines and E field lines at the same time
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
High School Measuring electric field vs magnetic field
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
High School Is My Magnet's Behavior Influenced by the Metal Plate?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Undergrad Railgun: Significant magnetic field where projectile is?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad How Does a Magnetic Repulsion Machine Work?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Magnetic field when the area of the plates of a capacitor increases
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
High School Experiment issues (electromagnetism)
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Undergrad Average Magnetic Field Between 2 Conducting Rods
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K