Can n be treated as a constant in this integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of the variable n in the context of an integral, specifically whether n can be considered a constant when it appears in both the integrand and the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of treating n as a constant within the integral, questioning how to handle its presence in both the integrand and the limits of integration. There is a discussion about the form of the integral and the properties of constants in integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants assert that n can be treated as a constant, while others provide reasoning and examples to support this view. The conversation includes attempts to clarify the relationship between n and the integration process, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an underlying assumption that n is not a function of t, which is not explicitly stated but is implied in the discussion.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


n
∫2n-tdt
0

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I've been wondering about the correct way to deal with this type of integral for quite a long time. To me, the above integral looks like something of the form:
n
∫f(n,t)dt
0
n appears in the integrand AND in the limits of integration, how can I integrate in this case?

I am just wondering whether n can be treated as a "constant" in the above integral, i.e. can I treat 2^n as a constant and pull the 2^n OUT of the integral and evaluate
n
∫2-tdt ?
0

Thank you for explaining!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the n is a constant in this case.
 
First, 2n-t= 2n 2-t.

Second, the derivative of 2t is (ln 2)2t so the anti-derivative is 2t/ln(2).
 
morphism said:
Yes, the n is a constant in this case.
So even though "n" appears in the integrand and also appears in the limits of integration, we can still treat the "n" in the integrand as a constant and use the property ∫cf(t)dt=c∫f(t)dt ?
 
Last edited:
If you integrating with respect to t, you don't have to worry about anything else unless n is a function of t, which it is not stated to be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K