Can neocortex initiate emotional behaviour and what is it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sameeralord
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the role of the neocortex in initiating emotional behavior and its relationship with the limbic system. Participants explore the implications of this relationship for understanding moral values, social behavior, and the biological basis of emotions, with a focus on human uniqueness and cultural influences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the neocortex can activate emotional responses through ideas, suggesting a connection with the limbic system.
  • Others argue that moral values are cultural constructs rather than biologically determined, emphasizing the role of culture in defining moral rules.
  • A participant mentions that the neocortex contributes to understanding social values and moral reasoning, particularly during developmental stages like adolescence.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for basic biological programming that transcends culture, with some suggesting that certain pro-social behaviors may be innate.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity and utility of the term "limbic system," with references to literature questioning its conceptual validity.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of the limbic system and its implications for emotional behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between the neocortex and emotional behavior, the nature of moral values, and the validity of the limbic system concept. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of the limbic system, differing perspectives on the biological versus cultural basis of morality, and the complexity of the relationship between brain structures and emotional behavior.

sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

Can neocortex initiate emotional behaviour. Since it is outside limbic system, is it not considered part of limbic system. What exactly is this structure? Why only humans have this. Does this give us moral values. Thanks :smile:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Sure, there's connections between both systems. You can activate an emotional response just by having a certain idea.

It's not like the limbic system is isolated from the rest of the brain.

Humans are not unique in this regard, and it has nothing to do with moral values. Moral values are cultural and relativistic. Not biological.
 
Thanks for the reply :smile: I don't know why I corelatd this with moral values??
 
Neocortex does take part in social values. We have to be able to appreciate and learn social values in the first place. Teenagers, for instance are still myelinating their frontal lobe axons.

http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/teenage-brain-a-work-in-progress-fact-sheet/index.shtml
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Taking part in a process is different than determining that process. The moral values of a culture are not determined by the biology of the Brain.

Of course the Brain has a part to play in social interaction and development. In understanding the rules, having a theory of mind, and all those things. They will influence how you take in, interpret, and follow moral rules.

I still argue, however, that the culture determines which rules to follow in the first place. There is no such thing as an ultimate right or wrong. All you have to do is look at a couple dozen hunter gatherer societies to see that morals vary widely among humans.
 
I'm not arguing against your post, I was answering post #3
 
ebits21 said:
Taking part in a process is different than determining that process. The moral values of a culture are not determined by the biology of the Brain.

Of course the Brain has a part to play in social interaction and development. In understanding the rules, having a theory of mind, and all those things. They will influence how you take in, interpret, and follow moral rules.

I still argue, however, that the culture determines which rules to follow in the first place. There is no such thing as an ultimate right or wrong. All you have to do is look at a couple dozen hunter gatherer societies to see that morals vary widely among humans.

All true, yet there is a valid argument for some basic programming if you will, which transcends culture. I'm not talking about anything complex, just pro-social elements like those Pythagorean refers to.

I'd add, in this process, whatever role the neocortex plays seems to be fairly key. Sadly, this is where imaging of today starts to seem a bit like phrenology, but while I agree that no absolute morality exists... this is in the context of biology and the human brain.

I'd add, if you look at those groups and strip away the varnish of culture, and just examine them in terms of:

1.) Initial moral state of an organism... its default BIOS.
2.) The demands of the environment
3.) Discrepancies between the CURRENT demands of the environment, and cultural artifacts of previous demands.

... I think you'd find them more alike than not.
 
sameeralord said:
neocortex (...) Since it is outside limbic system, is it not considered part of limbic system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbic_cortex" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've heard this view a couple times, so I thought I'd mention it. I don't really know enough about the so-called "limbic system" to have an educated opinion"

Useless or Helpful? The concept "limbic system"
(R. Kotter, Reviews in Neuroscience)
http://www.hirn.uni-duesseldorf.de/rk/LS/ls97.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Pythagorean said:
I've heard this view a couple times, so I thought I'd mention it. I don't really know enough about the so-called "limbic system" to have an educated opinion"

Useless or Helpful? The concept "limbic system"
(R. Kotter, Reviews in Neuroscience)
http://www.hirn.uni-duesseldorf.de/rk/LS/ls97.pdf

Isn't it fun when art and science mix? That is a very lucid article in my view, and to me the takeaway is not to assume agreement or knowledge on this topic for one. For another, it would seem to indicate a creep in textbooks and teaching of intellectual laziness on this topic, which is utterly unacceptable.

In my view, the term is valuable only in casual conversation such as those had online; the moment a serious non-common definition arrives, it should be abandoned for superior descriptive terms which already exist.

If the DMN were sold this way, neuroscientists would be crucified!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
7K