Can Non-Riemannian Geometry Exist Without a Metric?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
Non-Riemannian Geommetry ??

in Riemann Geommetry one needs a metric to define a distance so

[tex]ds^{2}= g_{i,j}dx^{i}dx^{j}[/tex] is a Bilinear form

the idea is can this be generalized to a non-metric Geommetry ? i mean, you define the distance via a function F so

[tex]ds^{2}= F(x_{i} , x_{j},dx_í} , dx_{j} )[/tex]

so this time we do not have a Bilinear form or we do not have or depend on a metric [tex]g_{i,j}[/tex] is this the Non-Riemannian Geommetry ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The word "Riemannian" also usually implies that the quadratic form g is positive definite. Then Lorentz metrics constitute "non-Riemannian" geometry, but since changing the signature is not too big of a change, usually we just say "pseudo-Riemannian".

As Quasar mentions, Finsler geometry is another option. Finsler geometry is to Riemannian geometry as Banach space is to Hilbert space. That is, in Finsler geometry, you define a norm, but not an inner product. The norm satisfies the triangle inequality, but there is no notion of angles. There are some other properties that I can't remember.