Can one "chop" up S^3 into little cubes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of partitioning a three-sphere (S^3) into smaller hexahedra. It establishes that while achieving perfect 90-degree angles may not be feasible, it is possible to divide S^3 into hexahedra by utilizing a hypercube and projecting its edges onto the circumscribing three-sphere. This method mirrors the successful division of a two-sphere (S^2) into quadrilaterals by projecting a cube's edges. The conversation concludes that while smaller quadrilaterals may not maintain equal side lengths and angles, a uniform grid-like structure can be achieved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of three-dimensional geometry
  • Familiarity with the concept of S^3 (three-sphere)
  • Knowledge of hypercubes and their properties
  • Basic principles of geometric projection
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of hypercubes in higher dimensions
  • Study the mathematical techniques for projecting geometric shapes onto spheres
  • Investigate the division of S^2 into quadrilaterals for comparative analysis
  • Research translation invariance in geometric contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students studying higher-dimensional spaces who are interested in geometric partitioning and projection techniques.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
Say I live in a very large, fixed radius, three-sphere. Could a mathematician pick a very large set of points at the right locations in my three-sphere such that when each point was connected to their nearest 6 neighbors with short line segments that locally I would have a nearly rectangular 3 dimensional grid that would also be uniform in the sense that from any point the grid would look the same, lengths of line segments all the same and angles between nearest line segments nearly or exactly 90 degrees?

Would be some kind of translation in-variance?

Would this be in effect "chopping" up a three-sphere into little cubes? Is there a smallest number of cubes that a three-sphere can be chopped into or do we only get cubes when the number of cubes is very large?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
90 degree corners will probably not work, but if all you want to do is divide ##S^3## into hexahedra, then I think the answer is yes. The answer to the analogous question for ##S^2## (dividing it into quadrilaterals) is yes, as follows:

Consider a unit cube, and a sphere circumscribing it, such that they intersect in the 8 corners of the cube. Now project the edges of the cube up onto the sphere. The sphere is now divided into 6 squares, which are quadrilaterals of equal side lengths and equal angles (which will, in this case, be 120 degrees). If you want to divide the sphere into smaller "squares", then put a grid on the faces of your cube, and project that up as well. But the smaller quadrilaterals will not have equal side lengths and equal angles.

You can imagine a similar process should work for ##S^3##; just start with a hypercube and its circumscribing 3-sphere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K