- #211
scott1
- 350
- 1
Russ_watters beats MK in post
Can Rock, Paper, Scissors Be Reinvented with New Rules?
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around a reimagined version of the game Rock, Paper, Scissors, where participants propose objects that "beat" the previous object in a creative and humorous manner. The scope includes playful interactions and imaginative reasoning, with specific rules set to guide the responses.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests starting a new game with boundaries, emphasizing that responses must follow a specific format and cannot include certain disallowed elements.
- Another participant introduces thermite as an object that can burn through a computer and other materials, challenging others to beat it.
- Several participants engage in playful banter about the rules, with some questioning the validity of previous responses and others attempting to clarify the game's mechanics.
- Multiple objects are proposed as responses, including sulfuric acid, lye, and various animals, each claiming to defeat the previous object in a humorous manner.
- Participants express confusion over the implications of time travel and the paradoxes that arise from the game's rules, particularly regarding the sequence of actions.
- Some participants suggest restarting the game from specific points due to perceived violations of the established rules.
- There are instances of off-topic comments and humorous exchanges that contribute to the playful nature of the discussion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally do not reach consensus on the validity of certain responses and the interpretation of the rules, leading to multiple competing views and ongoing debate.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include unresolved paradoxes regarding the sequence of actions and the implications of the rules, particularly concerning time travel and the definition of "beating" an object.
- #212
JamesU
Gold Member
- 821
- 3
hammer beats russ waters
- #213
scott1
- 350
- 1
Scerwdriver beats hammer
- #214
JamesU
Gold Member
- 821
- 3
chainsaw beats screwdriver
- #215
scott1
- 350
- 1
Weilder beats chainsaw
- #216
scott_alexsk
- 335
- 0
Nonmetals beat weilder.
-scott
-scott
- #217
Mk
- 2,039
- 4
Dual-weilder beats weilder.
- #218
scott1
- 350
- 1
semi-conductors beats Nonmetalsscott_alexsk said:
- #219
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,319
- 8,514
Hm. A little late to disqualify some things now...
Technically, post 87:
"...Tripping office worker assigned to shred Kyoto Accord results in his tie being sucked into paper shredder. Office worker gets bloody nose, strained neck, and the paper shredder is inoperable..."
violates rule b] :
"...no people or actions..."
but that was 10 pages ago!
The next one I found was post #110:
"...Basilisk outstares the paltry HEL rays..."
which violates rule c] :
"...no fictional objects or half-baked theoretical objects..."
(Ok, I'm not deliberately picking on Arildno).
If I wanted to be a strict hard-ass, I could keep yanking it back into line, but I think that might actually knock the fun out of it.
So I guess this thread continues on its slow progress towards silliness...
Technically, post 87:
"...Tripping office worker assigned to shred Kyoto Accord results in his tie being sucked into paper shredder. Office worker gets bloody nose, strained neck, and the paper shredder is inoperable..."
violates rule b] :
"...no people or actions..."
but that was 10 pages ago!
The next one I found was post #110:
"...Basilisk outstares the paltry HEL rays..."
which violates rule c] :
"...no fictional objects or half-baked theoretical objects..."
(Ok, I'm not deliberately picking on Arildno).
If I wanted to be a strict hard-ass, I could keep yanking it back into line, but I think that might actually knock the fun out of it.
So I guess this thread continues on its slow progress towards silliness...
Last edited:
- #220
scott_alexsk
- 335
- 0
Cold beats semi-conductors.
-Scott
-Scott
- #221
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 10,135
- 138
Sex beats cold.
- #222
Mk
- 2,039
- 4
I think this rule should be changed to allow mythical objects and organisms.
- #223
scott1
- 350
- 1
Super nova beats coldscott_alexsk said:
- #224
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 10,135
- 138
Too late; sex beats cold.scott1 said:
You must find something that beats sex.
- #225
scott_alexsk
- 335
- 0
Being alive beats sex.
-Scott
-Scott
- #226
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 10,135
- 138
H***** beats being alive..
- #227
scott1
- 350
- 1
censorship beats H*****arildno said:
- #228
Mattara
- 347
- 1
Teens revolting against censorship coz they won't get the göd stuff beats censorship (or atleast make the people who work with it out of a job, but that is beating i guess :D)
- #229
scott1
- 350
- 1
Draft beats teens revoltingMattara said:
I'am scott1 and I approve this message
- #230
Mk
- 2,039
- 4
Drought beats draft.
- #231
Lisa!
Gold Member
- 650
- 96
Raining beats drought!
- #232
Mk
- 2,039
- 4
Leidenfrost effect beats rain.
- #233
scott1
- 350
- 1
The lake effect beats the Leidenfrost effect
- #234
Chi Meson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 1,890
- 11
El Nino beats lake effect.
(edit: post kills fun?)
(edit: post kills fun?)
Last edited:
- #235
scott1
- 350
- 1
La Niña beats El Nino
- #236
Mk
- 2,039
- 4
Ll Transvestite beats La Niña AND El Niño!
- #237
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 10,135
- 138
A kick in the balls beats transvestite.
- #238
Mattara
- 347
- 1
wearing a titanium alloy cup beats a kick in the balls
- #239
Mk
- 2,039
- 4
Howitzer beats titanium alloy cup.
- #240
scott1
- 350
- 1
thermonuclear missile beats Howitzer
Similar threads
- · Replies 2 ·