Can Rock, Paper, Scissors Be Reinvented with New Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Rock
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a reimagined version of the game Rock, Paper, Scissors, where participants propose objects that "beat" the previous object in a creative and humorous manner. The scope includes playful interactions and imaginative reasoning, with specific rules set to guide the responses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting a new game with boundaries, emphasizing that responses must follow a specific format and cannot include certain disallowed elements.
  • Another participant introduces thermite as an object that can burn through a computer and other materials, challenging others to beat it.
  • Several participants engage in playful banter about the rules, with some questioning the validity of previous responses and others attempting to clarify the game's mechanics.
  • Multiple objects are proposed as responses, including sulfuric acid, lye, and various animals, each claiming to defeat the previous object in a humorous manner.
  • Participants express confusion over the implications of time travel and the paradoxes that arise from the game's rules, particularly regarding the sequence of actions.
  • Some participants suggest restarting the game from specific points due to perceived violations of the established rules.
  • There are instances of off-topic comments and humorous exchanges that contribute to the playful nature of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach consensus on the validity of certain responses and the interpretation of the rules, leading to multiple competing views and ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved paradoxes regarding the sequence of actions and the implications of the rules, particularly concerning time travel and the definition of "beating" an object.

  • #181
Hammer beats superluminal RV
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #182
Rules beats Hammer
 
Last edited:
  • #183
Greg Bernhardt beats rules
 
  • #184
chroot beats Greg Bernhardt
 
  • #185
hacker beats chroot
 
  • #186
Bill gates beats hacker
 
  • #187
Melinda beats Bill
 
  • #188
Time magizine beats Melinda
 
  • #189
paper shredder beats time magazine
 
  • #190
Nuclear waste dumb beats paper sherder
 
Last edited:
  • #191
Armadillo devours nuclear waste
 
  • #192
Chevy truck (with gun rack) runs over armadillo.
 
  • #193
Chi Meson said:
Chevy truck (with gun rack) runs over armadillo.
I know. It's so sad..:cry:
 
  • #194
Chi Meson said:
Chevy truck (with gun rack) runs over armadillo.
Tank blows up Chevy Turck with gunrack
 
  • #195
Dont cry he's not dead
chevy chase chases speeding chevy whilst on vacation , lampoons and distroys it with shoulder launched armadillo which survived being run over by chevy after it was geneticlly altered and made stronger after eating nuclear waste.:)
 
  • #196
Armadillo bites a teenage nerd so that he mutates and becomes Armadilloman but then kills do the his new 24-7 job of crime fighting
 
  • #197
Time kills armadillo.

Wait, is this allowed? Rules state going back in time isn't, but it doesn't say anything about going forward in time...
 
  • #198
Too late...
 
  • #199
rocketboy said:
Time kills armadillo.
Hammer!

Time can be applied to anything animate.

Leprosy beats armadillo.
 
  • #200
leper colony beats Leprosy
 
  • #201
ant colony eats leper colony.

(That one disgusts myself)
 
  • #202
anteater eats ant colony.
 
  • #203
mallet(hammer)[/color]beats anteater
 
  • #204
Incenerator beats mallet.
-scott
 
  • #205
The Sun beats incenerator
 
  • #206
Blair promises to aid any surviving ants, the news of the world shows video of the sun beating the incinerator.
 
Last edited:
  • #207
Scott1 beats George W. Bush in presidential elections:approve:
 
  • #208
scotts or scott2 if you read the second s backwards beats scott1.
-scott

Edit: Better yet scott_alexsk beats scott1 in posts.
 
  • #209
scott_alexsk said:
scotts or scott2 if you read the second s backwards beats scott1.
-scott

Edit: Better yet scott_alexsk beats scott1 in posts.
:confused: :confused:
I have no Idea what your talking about.

Edit:I think I have more post then you
https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?do=finduser&u=42611
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #210
Mk beats scott_alexsk in posts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
7K