Can Serenity Fly in Hover Mode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lancelot59
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of the spaceship Serenity flying in hover mode. Participants analyze its design, noting that its small wings and aerodynamic inefficiencies would hinder flight capabilities. They compare Serenity to the V-22 Osprey, highlighting the challenges of stability and control due to its center of gravity and thrust vectoring. Suggestions for creating a remote-controlled version include the need for advanced stabilization systems and the potential for adding additional turbines for better pitch control. Overall, the consensus leans toward the belief that Serenity would struggle to achieve stable flight.
  • #31
DaveC426913 said:
You're comparing a Saturn V to a Firefly??

I am fairly certain the Wright brothers would take one look and an F104 Starfighter and laugh their butts off.

I tend to agree here. Just because it's unconventional doesn't mean it wouldn't work. That vertical moment looks like it could be balanced out. The clockwise moment from the cockpit balanced by the counterclockwise moment of the rear end, which sits lower than the pylons, and the centre of mass.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Lancelot59 said:
I tend to agree here. Just because it's unconventional doesn't mean it wouldn't work. That vertical moment looks like it could be balanced out. The clockwise moment from the cockpit balanced by the counterclockwise moment of the rear end, which sits lower than the pylons, and the centre of mass.
Yes. We don't actually know how the mass is distributed internally. For all we know, the bilge is very dense.


Additionally, as far as the aerodynamic stability Henry is concerned about, even aircraft today must be computer-controlled to be stable. Many modern jet fighters are minutely controlled on the order of 30 times per second to remain in stable flight, without which they would break up faster than they could fall out of the sky.

It is not unreasonable to suppose that a spacecraft an indeterminate number of centuries in the future might be similarly sophisticated.
 
  • #33
DaveC426913 said:
Yes. We don't actually know how the mass is distributed internally. For all we know, the bilge is very dense.Additionally, as far as the aerodynamic stability Henry is concerned about, even aircraft today must be computer-controlled to be stable. Many modern jet fighters are minutely controlled on the order of 30 times per second to remain in stable flight, without which they would break up faster than they could fall out of the sky.

It is not unreasonable to suppose that a spacecraft an indeterminate number of centuries in the future might be similarly sophisticated.

As some people pointed out to me when I first had this idea, it wouldn't be an easy thing to accomplish. However it is certainly within the realm of possibility. It might not fly as well as it did on the show, but it could certainly fly. We've certainly made much stranger things take flight:

http://books.google.ca/books?id=xSg...sult&ct=result&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
853
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
90
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K