Can someone check my setup for finding E.dl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emhelp100
  • Start date Start date
emhelp100
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge +Q exists at the origin. Find [itex]\oint[/itex] [itex]\vec{E}[/itex] [itex]\cdot \vec{dl}[/itex] around a square centered around the origin. I know the answer is 0, but can someone check my setup?

Homework Equations


[itex]E=\frac{Q(\vec{R}-\vec{R'})}{4\pi E_0 |\vec{R}-\vec{R'}|^3}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution

upload_2018-4-15_0-41-44.png
[/B]

For E1 and E3, R = [itex]\hat{x}x+\hat{y}\frac{a}{2}[/itex] and R' = [itex]0[/itex]
E1 = E3 = [itex]\frac{Q\hat{x}x+\hat{y}\frac{a}{2}}{4\pi E_0(x^2+\frac{a^2}{4})^{3/2}}[/itex]
dl1=dl3 = [itex]\hat{x}dx[/itex]

E2=E4=[itex]\frac{Q\hat{x}\frac{a}{2}+\hat{y}y}{4\pi E_0(y^2+\frac{a^2}{4})^{3/2}}[/itex]
dl2=dl4 = [itex]\hat{y}dy[/itex]
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-4-15_0-41-44.png
    upload_2018-4-15_0-41-44.png
    763 bytes · Views: 395
Physics news on Phys.org
Apart from misssing brackets :smile: ?
And asssuming the obvious integration limits ?
And assuming (from the picture) E1 is for (a/2, 0) to (a/2,a/2) -- in which case you mixed up 1,3 with 2,4 ?

However, not bad for a first thread! Hello EM, :welcome:
 
BvU said:
Apart from misssing brackets :smile: ?
And asssuming the obvious integration limits ?
And assuming (from the picture) E1 is for (a/2, 0) to (a/2,a/2) -- in which case you mixed up 1,3 with 2,4 ?

However, not bad for a first thread! Hello EM, :welcome:
E1 is the line segment from (a/2,-a/2) to (a/2, a/2)
 
Of course, but there ##\vec {dl} = (0, dy)##
 
BvU said:
Of course, but there ##\vec {dl} = (0, dy)##
That is because x stays constant and y changes right?
 
Correct. And the expression for E1 has a constant ##x={a\over 2}## and a varying ##y##
 
BvU said:
Correct. And the expression for E1 has a constant ##x={a\over 2}## and a varying ##y##
So would this setup be correct?
E1 = E3 = [itex]\frac{Q}{4\pi E_0} \frac{\hat{x}{x}+\hat{y}\frac{a}{2}}{(x^2+\frac{a^2}{4})^{3/2}}[/itex]
dl1=dl3 = [itex]\hat{y}dy[/itex]

E2 = E4 = [itex]\frac{Q}{4\pi E_0}\frac{\hat{x}\frac{a}{2}+\hat{y}{y}}{(y^2+\frac{a^2}{4})^{3/2}}[/itex]
dl2=dl4 = [itex]\hat{x}dx[/itex]
 
:wink: You sound as if you hesitate. Have you not convinced yourself?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: emhelp100
BvU said:
:wink: You sound as if you hesitate. Have you not convinced yourself?
So now that I have this:
[itex]\int_{\frac{-a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}[/itex] [itex]\frac{\hat{x}\frac{a}{2}+\hat{y}y}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+y^2)^{3/2}}dy[/itex]
How do I integrate this?
 
  • #10
Do you realize you have written two integrals ?
 
  • #11
BvU said:
Do you realize you have written two integrals ?
[itex]\int_{\frac{-a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\hat{x}\frac{a}{2}}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+y^2)^{3/2}}dy[/itex]+[itex]\int_{\frac{-a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}[/itex][itex]\frac{\hat{y}y}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+y^2)^{3/2}}dy[/itex]
 
  • #12
Yes, so one component in the ##\hat x## direction and one in the ##\hat y## direction.
I am too lazy to work out the integral, so I try to sneak my way out: what about the second one, in the ##\hat y## direction ?
 
  • #13
Just to make sure: we see that we don't have to find a primitive to establish the value...
 
  • #14
BvU said:
Just to make sure: we see that we don't have to find a primitive to establish the value...
What does this mean?
For E1 and E3, the x^ direction integral canceled out.

For E2 and E4, the y^ direction integral canceled out.I am left with:
[itex] \int_{\frac{-a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}\frac{\hat{x}\frac{a}{2}}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+y^2)^{3/2}}dy - \int_{\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{-a}{2}}\frac{\hat{x}\frac{a}{2}}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+y^2)^{3/2}}dy+<br /> \int_{\frac{a}{2}}^{\frac{-a}{2}}\frac{\hat{y}\frac{a}{2}}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+x^2)^{3/2}}dx-\int_{\frac{-a}{2}}^{\frac{a}{2}}\frac{\hat{y}\frac{a}{2}}{(\frac{a^2}{4}+x^2)^{3/2}}dx[/itex]
 
  • #15
Being lazier than @BvU, I would use symmetry and note that the four line integrals along each side must be equal because if one rotated the square by 90o or 180o or 270o while you were not looking at it, you wouldn't know the difference. So there is only one integral to do. But wait, there is another symmetry to consider. Do you see what it is?
 
  • #16
kuruman said:
Being lazier than @BvU, I would use symmetry and note that the four line integrals along each side must be equal because if one rotated the square by 90o or 180o or 270o while you were not looking at it, you wouldn't know the difference. So there is only one integral to do. But wait, there is another symmetry to consider. Do you see what it is?
I don't see it...
 
  • #17
You know that each of the four line integrals gives you the same number by symmetry. You also know that the result around the closed loop is zero. What does this say about the line integral along one of the sides? How can you get that number? Hint: Look at segment E2. Consider two points on it at ##+x## and ##-x##. What is ##\vec E \cdot d\vec l## at these points?
 
  • #18
kuruman said:
Being lazier than @BvU
Impossible :-p . Apart from that: We both want to exploit symmetry. Can be done from the math side and/or from the physics side
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K