Can Someone Help with Gaussian Beams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Green Lantern
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams Gaussian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating parameters related to a He-Ne laser's Gaussian beam profile, specifically its spot size and intensity distribution. The Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of the intensity profile is given as 5.00 microns, which allows for the calculation of the beam waist (w(0)). The wavelength of the He-Ne laser is confirmed to be approximately 633 nm, which is essential for further calculations. Participants clarify the relationship between w(z) and the beam's width, emphasizing the importance of understanding the Gaussian beam equations for accurate measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian beam optics
  • Familiarity with Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) calculations
  • Knowledge of laser wavelengths, specifically He-Ne laser at 633 nm
  • Basic proficiency in using laser intensity equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the beam waist (w(0)) for the He-Ne laser using the FWHM value
  • Determine the fraction of laser intensity contained within the FWHM
  • Explore the concept of Rayleigh range (z(R)) in Gaussian beams
  • Investigate the angular spread of Gaussian beams over large distances
USEFUL FOR

Laser scientists, optical engineers, and students studying laser physics who are interested in understanding Gaussian beam properties and calculations related to laser intensity profiles.

Green Lantern
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3. A laser scientist tells you that her He-Ne laser can be focused to a spot size of 5.00 microns. When pressed for details, she tells you that she got this number by measuring the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of the intensity profile of the laser waist.

a) What is w(0) for this laser?

b) What fraction of the laser intensity is contained within the FHWM?

c) At what (full) angle will the beam spread over large distances, if one continues to measure the width of the laser beam to be the FHWM of the intensity?

Homework Equations



254ca016952b78f3597feda00adbb4f6.png


e58a707d1ccf4ed6cefac660633038a8.png


[PLAIN]http://www.zemax.com/kb/content_images/fwhm/Equation1.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/GaussianBeamWaist.svg/350px-GaussianBeamWaist.svg.png[/URL]

From previous experience in a laboratory I know that the wavelength of a He-Ne laser is about 633 nm. I don't know if I can assume that for the purposes of this question. I'm using Laser Electronics 3E by Joseph Verdeyen and the book doesn't do a good job of explaining full width half maximum intensity. There's also no sample problems in the book or examples so I really can't tell if I'm doing it right. I don't know either z or z(R), although I can express z(R) in terms of w(0), but I don't know that quantity either. The equation for intensity above didn't come from my book. At least I didn't see it there. Am I supposed to use the 0.5 microns as w(z) for the intensity equation here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm just going to bump this topic.
 
What does w(z) represent? I assume it's some sort of measure of the width of the beam, but how is it defined exactly?
 
The book here gives w(z) as the spot size. There is a minimum spot size at a certain point along the z-axis defined as z=0.
 
vela said:
What does w(z) represent? I assume it's some sort of measure of the width of the beam, but how is it defined exactly?
It's defined by this equation given in the OP:

[PLAIN]http://www.zemax.com/kb/content_images/fwhm/Equation1.jpg[/INDENT]

where I0 is the intensity at r=0. I0 and w are both functions of z. At the beam's focus, w takes on it's minimum value, denoted by w0.

Green Lantern, if you set I=I0/2 in that equation, you can determine what r is at the half-maximum points.

Green Lantern said:
From previous experience in a laboratory I know that the wavelength of a He-Ne laser is about 633 nm. I don't know if I can assume that for the purposes of this question.
Yes, that is a reasonably valid assumption.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
3K