Can Space-Time Rip? What Causes Tears & Healing?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DuckAmuck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rip Space-time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of whether space-time can rip and the implications of such a phenomenon. Participants conclude that while space-time cannot literally rip, singularities, such as those found in black holes, exhibit properties that could be interpreted as rips due to their infinitely depressed nature. The conversation emphasizes the need for a theory of quantum gravity to fully understand these singularities, which are currently beyond the descriptive capabilities of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on space-time.
  • Familiarity with black hole physics and singularities.
  • Basic knowledge of quantum gravity theories.
  • Concept of tension in the context of physical theories.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of black hole singularities on space-time structure.
  • Study current theories of quantum gravity, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity.
  • Explore the mathematical framework of general relativity and its limitations.
  • Investigate the concept of "depression" in space-time and its physical interpretations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the nature of space-time, black holes, and the quest for a unified theory of gravity.

DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
If so, what causes it to rip? Does it "heal"? What would a rip look like to us? What is the tension threshold at which spacetime rips? What are the units of this "tension"?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not so sure. I suppose it depends what you mean by ripped. If ripped = infinitely depressed, then I think the answer to this would be yes, as that's a black hole, a "depression" in space time that when light travels along a path through that singularity, it never comes out, presumably because it never reaches the "bottom" of the "depression". At least that's been my interpretation. With this in mind, a singularity would be indistinguishable from a rip. However, I don't think you can talk about "holes" in space-time, as that's pretty meaningless. (There's a region of ? where space-time doesn't exist, so either a region of space, where time doesn't exist, or a region of time where space doesn't exist, or a region of something where neither exists. Doesn't seem to make much sense.)
 
I think that the singularity at the centre of a black hole is general relativity's way of telling you that it can't describe what's going on there. We need a theory of quantum gravity to describe it properly. So I would be a bit cautious about interpreting it literally as a hole in spacetime.
 
Not literally, but indistinguishable. If you can differentiate the two. This singularity behaves as a hole would behave, in that light just sort of "disappears", as one would expect to happen with a rip.
Perhaps you are correct about the QG, but I think a proper description of the singularity (yet to come about) would suffice just as well. IMHO.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K