littlemathquark
- 204
- 26
- Homework Statement
- ##\sqrt{\dfrac{3^8+5^8+34^4}2} =?##
- Relevant Equations
- None
I can't find a short solution without using calculator.
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression \(3^8 + 5^8 + 34^4\) without a calculator, utilizing algebraic identities and properties of prime factors. Participants explore various methods, including the substitution of variables \(x=3\) and \(y=5\), and the application of the identity \(m^4 + n^4 + (m+n)^4 = 2(3m^2 + 3mn + n^2)^2\). The conclusion emphasizes that the expression can be simplified to \(9^4 + 25^4 + 34^4\) and ultimately leads to a perfect square, demonstrating a systematic approach to algebraic manipulation.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, algebra students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced algebraic techniques for simplifying expressions and understanding polynomial identities.
##3^8+5^8+34^4=9^4+25^4+34^4=9^4+25^4+(9+25)^4##Ibix said:Do 3, 5, and 34 (or their prime factors) have any properties in common that might help? Especially helpful if there are terms that might cancel when expanded.
This is a good starting point! Just go ahead by this method.littlemathquark said:##3^8+5^8+34^4=9^4+25^4+34^4=9^4+25^4+(9+25)^4##
That's all and I'm stuck.
Sorry I don't understand your solution. Can you give more detail please?fresh_42 said:This is a good starting point! Just go ahead by this method.
\begin{align*}
3^8+5^8+34^4&=9^4+25^4+(9+25)^4\\
&=9^4+(16+9)^4+(9+16+9)^4\\
&=9^4+(2\cdot 9+7)^4+(3\cdot 9+7)^4\\
&\ldots
\end{align*}
I put ##9^4## out of it and called ##7/9=c## and then ##2+c=25/9=d## and so on. The highest product I finally had to calculate was ##25\cdot 34=25(25+9)=625+225.##
\begin{align*}littlemathquark said:Sorry I don't understand your solution. Can you give more detail please?
That's what I did, additionally noting that ##34=2(4^2+1)##. That gave me a polynomial expression in powers of 4 that can be factorised (and there's an obvious factorisation that we want). OP's approach with ##3##, ##5##, and ##34=3^2+5^2## can be made to work similarly.Vanadium 50 said:That seems kind of out of the blue.
My starting point would be to replcae 3 with 4-1, 5 with 4+1 and use that to get rid of the 2. Then see what I had left.