Can Squaring Integrals Simplify Calculus Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ibraheem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
Squaring a definite integral does not equate to integrating twice, as demonstrated by the example function f(x) = x. The expression (Definite integral of f(x) from a to b)^2 does not equal the definite integral from a to b of the definite integral of f(x) from a to b. This leads to a more complex problem involving calculus of variations and the nature of constants in integration. The discussion also references the Poisson integral, illustrating how squaring can simplify certain integrals, ultimately leading to the conclusion that I is the square root of pi. Overall, while squaring integrals can be insightful, it does not yield the same results as double integration in general cases.
Ibraheem
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Hello,

When I recently was studying for my calculus I's rules of definite integrals, I was wondering if squaring a definite integral would be the same as integrating twice like in the following:( Definite integral of f(x) from a to b)^2 = definite integral ,from a to b, of the definite integral of f(x) from a to b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ibraheem said:
Hello,

When I recently was studying for my calculus I's rules of definite integrals, I was wondering if squaring a definite integral would be the same as integrating twice like in the following:( Definite integral of f(x) from a to b)^2 = definite integral ,from a to b, of the definite integral of f(x) from a to b)

Did you think to try this with an example function f(x)?
 
Simplest example f(x)=x.
 
Yes, It is clearer now.

( Definite integral of f(x) from a to b)^2 does not equal definite integral ,from a to b, of the definite integral of f(x) from a to b)
 
It may be interesting to figure out if it is ever actually true. But it is a hard problem, considering all possible functions and all possible limits of integration. Seems maybe an issue of calculus of variations?
 
How does this make sense? The RHS is "definite integral ,from a to b, of the definite integral of f(x) from a to b)"
which equals definite integral, from a to b, of a constant.
 
A constant is a continuous function, which can be Riemann-integrated: ##\int_a^b C dx=C(b-a) ##
 
ok then so letting Integral[a,b] f(x)dx =C, the problem is equivalent to C^2= C(b-a) and hence C=0 or b-a
 
Yes, seems right.
 
  • #10
Hmm I think i saw something like what you're saying once.. a way of solving the poisson integral by squaring it... It was something like I^2=Integral [minus, plus infinity] e^(-x^2)dx times same thing but with y instead of x... then you get integral [minus,plux] of integral [minus,plus] of e^-(x^2+y^2)dxdy which is an integral over the whole xy plane... and so you can change to polar coordinates and you easily get the result for that integral which is pi... so there you have it.. I squared is pi, therefor I is the square root of pi..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K