Can Stoke's Theorem Be Applied to Different Surfaces with the Same Boundary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bodensee9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Stoke's Theorem, particularly regarding the equivalence of surface integrals over different surfaces that share the same boundary. Participants explore the implications of this theorem in the context of vector fields and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which Stoke's Theorem applies, particularly questioning whether the divergence of the vector field affects the validity of the theorem. There is also a consideration of specific examples, such as integrating over a paraboloid versus a disk.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the assumptions underlying the application of Stoke's Theorem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the surface integrals and the line integral, but there is no explicit consensus on the conditions required for the theorem's application.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the implications of the divergence of the vector field and its relevance to the application of Stoke's Theorem. There is a focus on the specific forms of the vector field and the surfaces involved in the discussion.

bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Hello: I usually think of Stoke's Theorem as:

\oint F\bullet dr = \int \int curl F \bullet dS
where dr is over a curve C and dS is over a surface sigma. But today in class the instructor said that Stoke's Theorem can also be used to change the surface over which one is intergrating, so that if sigma has a well defined boundary, say, C, then the surface integral of function F over sigma = surface integral F over any surface with C as the boundary. A more concrete example, so then say you are integrating some F over a paraboloid z = sqrt(1-x^2-y^2) above the xy plane. So then would it be true that my surface integral over the paraboloid would be the same as if I integrated over the disk formed by x^2+y^2 = 1? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Stokes says the two surface integrals are equal to the same line integral. Why shouldn't they be equal?
 
they would be, but I thought then you must have that F is the curl of some other function. So if div F = 0 then it would be true. But would it be true if div F is not zero? Thanks.
 
The version of Stokes I'm thinking of says that the surface integral of curl(F).ds is equal to the line integral of F.dr. It doesn't say require div(F)=0. And it doesn't say anything about the surface integral of F itself, just curl(F).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K