Can the determinant of a combinatorial matrix be proven to always equal 1?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rbzima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The determinant of the combinatorial matrix A, defined by the entries a_{ij} = \binom{m_j + i - 1}{j - 1}, is conclusively equal to 1 for natural numbers n and m_j. The discussion highlights the necessity of a formal proof, suggesting methods such as matrix transposition, cofactor expansion, and induction over n. Additionally, exploring the properties of diagonals within the matrix may provide further insights into the determinant's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of combinatorial matrices and binomial coefficients
  • Familiarity with matrix determinants and cofactor expansion
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction techniques
  • Experience with matrix transposition and its properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for proving determinants of combinatorial matrices
  • Study the application of mathematical induction in matrix theory
  • Explore the properties of matrix transposition and its effects on determinants
  • Investigate the use of diagonal formulas in determinant calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and researchers interested in combinatorial matrix theory will benefit from this discussion.

rbzima
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Let [itex]A\Large[/itex] be the [itex]n \times n[/itex] matrix [itex](a_{ij})[/itex] given by
[tex]a_{ij} = \binom{m_j + i - 1}{j - 1}[/tex]
where [itex]i,j = 1, 2, ..., n[/itex] and [itex]n[/itex] and [itex]m_j[/itex] are natural numbers. Find the determinant of [itex]A\Large[/itex].

So, I've been looking at this problem for the past couple days and it is a really interesting problem. I discovered that the determinant is actually 1, however I'm wondering how to show this result in terms of a proof. If anyone has any suggestions, they would be greatly welcomed! ;)

I personally was thinking that when you transpose the matrices, something interesting happens with the nested matrices in the upper left corner moving outward, but I'm not entirely sure this is a right approach to be taking. Also, finding determinants by cofactors is really only helpful in smaller matrices, so I was wondering if it might also need to be expanded using the Big Formula, which in this case would consist of n! different terms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would first check whether it is still true for all ##m_j =1##. Then an induction over ##n## should be the way to prove it. Also formulas for the various diagonals might help a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K