B Can the Diagram in the Article Be Interpreted as Commutative?

Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
TL;DR Summary
Does the given example of commutative diagram use conventional notation?
I'm used to seeing commutative diagrams where the vertices are mathematical objects and the edges (arrows) are mappings between them. Can the diagram ( from the interesting article https://people.reed.edu/~jerry/332/25jordan.pdf ) in the attached photo be interpreted that way?

In the article:

##k[x]## is the ring of polynomials over a field k.

##V## is a vector space.

##T## is a linear transformation on ##V##

CommDiagScreenshot.jpg


I understand ##T## and ##X## as maps, but do the vertical arrows go from a map to the argument of a map?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The arrows (all of them, vertical and horizontal) go from element to element. Their LaTeX code is \mapsto.
 
I'll understand the vertical arrow on the left this way: There is an (unnamed) isomorphism mapping ##V## to a direct sum of quotient modules. So ##g(x) + <f_i(X)>## is one element of that direct sum and it is in the coset of the ##<f_i(X)>##. So the unnamed isomorphism maps an element of the direct sum to a vector ##v## in ##V##.
 
the visual clue to what fresh and Stephen are saying is that the arrows have little tails at the beginning which are perpendicular to the arrow.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephen Tashi
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
Back
Top