Can the Earth's Magnetic Field Be Measured by Reversals?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Earth's magnetic field, specifically addressing why objects on its surface do not become magnetized and the possibility of measuring the magnetic field's frequency. Participants explore concepts related to magnetization, geomagnetic storms, and the implications of magnetic field reversals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that objects on the Earth's surface do get magnetized, but the magnetic field is not strong enough to create powerful magnets, leaving only measurable traces in certain rocks.
  • There is a discussion about the static nature of the Earth's magnetic field, which changes over long timescales but does not exhibit periodic behavior, leading to questions about the meaning of "frequency."
  • One participant mentions that steel ships built in different hemispheres become magnetized in opposite directions, referencing historical applications of degaussing to protect ships from magnetic mines.
  • Another participant notes that the Earth's magnetic field strength is continuously measured at various sites, which helps monitor geomagnetic storms caused by solar activity, with significant fluctuations observed during such events.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of using the frequency of magnetic field reversals, suggesting it is irregular but on the order of 100 fHz.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the magnetization of objects on the Earth's surface and the interpretation of measuring the magnetic field's frequency. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of frequency and field strength, as well as the assumptions about the nature of the Earth's magnetic field and its effects on various materials.

Akmalidin
Messages
69
Reaction score
6
As we all know The Earth has a magnetic field. Why the objects on the surface of the Earth do not get magnetized? It is possible to measure the magnetic field frequency of the Earth?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Akmalidin said:
Why the objects on the surface of the Earth do not get magnetized?
They do. The magnetic field of Earth is not strong enough to make powerful magnets, but it is sufficient to leave a measurable trace in some types of rock.
Akmalidin said:
It is possible to measure the magnetic field frequency of the Earth?
It is a static field. It changes over long timescales, but not in a periodic way so "frequency" is not a very meaningful concept.
 
Akmalidin said:
Why the objects on the surface of the Earth do not get magnetized?
They do.

Steel ships built in the Northern Hemisphere are magnetised in the opposite direction to those built in the Southern Hemisphere. The “magnetic detector” mines used in WW2 detected Northern built ships but not the Southern ones. Degaussing ships became very important. By cancelling or reversing the field “the ship could be made invisible”, but only to German magnetic mines.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degaussing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deperming

This appears to be the origin of the “Mare's Nest” now called the Philadelphia Experiment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Eldridge_(DE-173)#Philadelphia_Experiment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment#Alternative_explanations
 
Akmalidin said:
It is possible to measure the magnetic field frequency of the Earth?

did you really mean frequency or field strength ?
The Earth's magnetic field strength is measures by a number of sites around the world on a continuous basis
These warn of the start of geomagnetic storms that produce aurora ... the upsets in the magnetic field is caused by changes in the interplanetary magnetic field produced by the Sun

Magnetometers are used to detect fluctuations in the geomagnetic field. during the onset of a geomagnetic storm I have seen variations in the field of up to 40 - 50 nT ( nano Teslas). But even variations in the 15 - 30 nT range are quite significant

To just quickly expand on mfb's comment and link on magnetised rocks.
The discovery of magnetic striping of rocks on the seafloor was the final significant proof of seafloor spreading and the plate tectonics ( continental drift) theory

Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dotini
I guess you could use the frequency of reversals, which is irregular, but of order 100 fHz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K