Can the Eigenvalues of A Determine if A^3=A?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noon0788
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the eigenvalues of a matrix A and the condition A^3 = A. The original poster questions whether knowing the eigenvalues (-1, +1, 0) allows for a proof that A^3 = A, and seeks clarification on the implications of these eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of eigenvalues on the matrix equation A^3 = A, with attempts to prove the converse. There are discussions about diagonalization, the role of eigenvectors, and the application of linearity in matrix operations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance without reaching a consensus. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the notation and concepts involved, particularly concerning eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the notation and concepts, indicating a potential gap in understanding linear algebra fundamentals. The discussion includes references to characteristic equations and the linearity of matrices, which may require further exploration.

noon0788
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm wondering if I have a known set of eigenvalues (-1, +1, 0) for A, if I can prove that the matrix A = A3?

I can prove that if A3 = A, that the eigenvalues would be −1, +1, and 0. The following is the proof:

A*k=lambda*k
A3*k=lambda3*k
Since A=A3, A*k=A3*k
lambda*k=lambda3*k
lambda*k - lambda3*k = 0
lambda - lambda3 = 0
lambda*(1-lambda2) = 0
lambda = 0, -1, +1


Is there any way to prove it the other way around? If I know that the eigenvalues are 0, -1, and +1, can I prove that A3 = A?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi noon0788! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Hint: A is linear, so if three eignevectors are p q and r, what is A3(ap + bq + cr) ? :wink:

(alternatively, write A = QPQ-1)
 
Thanks tiny-tim, but I'm not quite sure what you mean by A3(ap + bq + cr).

When you say A = QPQ-1, do you mean I should diagonalize the matrix? Here's what I'm thinking:

C-1AC = D (where d is the diagonalized matrix)

D = [1, 0, 0; 0, −1, 0; 0, 0, 0]

det(C-1)*det(A)*det(C) = det(D)
det(C-1)*det(C)*det(A) = det(D)
det(A) = det(D)
det(D) = 0
det(A) = 0

Maybe I'm way off...
 
I mean where a b and c are any numbers.

(And why are you using determinants?? :confused:)
 
:/ I don't know why I'm using determinants. I guess what I'm confused by is your notation of R3(ap+bq+cr). Is that I just don't recognize that notation. I'm familiar with matrices, but maybe not as familiar as I thought I was.
 
A3(ap+bq+cr) is matrix A followed by matrix A followed by matrix A followed by the sum of a times vector p plus b times vector q plus c times vector r, with Ap = p, Aq = -q, Ar = 0.
 
Thanks tiny-tim, but I think my question might just be a bit over my head. I'm confused as to why p q are r are vectors now. I thought they were eigenvalues. Also, the Ap=p stuff is confusing me too. Here's what I've got so far...

A3(a(1) + b(-1) + c(0))
A3(a-b)
A3a - A3b

Thanks for your help.
 
are a &b scalars or vectors?

I'll try to explain the idea better: the three eigenvectors are independent, therefore they create a basis to a three-tuple column vectors. Let's call them [tex]e_{1},e_{0},e_{-1}[/tex] (the index corresponds the eigenvalue).
Now any other vector will be:

[tex]\vec{v}=v_{1}\vec{e}_{1}+v_{0}\vec{e}_{0}+v_{-1}\vec{e}_{-1}[/tex]

Now, what is Av and what is [tex]A^{3}v[/tex]?
 
Hi noon0788! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
noon0788 said:
Thanks tiny-tim, but I think my question might just be a bit over my head. I'm confused as to why p q are r are vectors now. I thought they were eigenvalues.

No, they're eigenvectors.

(That's why Ap = p, with p's eigenvalue = 1 :wink:)

ok, now, for any numbers a b and c, what is A(ap + bq + cr) ? :smile:
 
  • #10
A(ap + bq + cr)
= A(ap) + A(bq) + A(cr)
= a(Ap) + b(Aq) + c(Ar)
= a + b
right?
 
  • #11
noon0788 said:
A(ap + bq + cr)
= A(ap) + A(bq) + A(cr)
= a(Ap) + b(Aq) + c(Ar)
= a + b
right?
Well, no! For one thing, on the left side you have a vector, A(ap+ bq+cr), and on the right you have a number, a+ b. p, b, and q are eigenvectors of A with eigenvalues of 1, -1, and 0, respectively.

A(ap+ bq+ cr)= (1)ap+ (-1)bq+ (0)cr= ap- bq. A2(ap+bq+cr)= A(ap- bq)= ap-(-bq)= ap+ bq. And, finally, A3(ap+ bq+ cr)= A(ap+bq)= ap- bq.

My first thought was to use the fact that every matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation. Since A has eigenvalues 1, -1, and 0, its characteristic equation is x(x+1)(x- 1)= x^3- x.
 
  • #12
I think I understand it. Just one more question. Am I allowed to distribute A in A(ap + bq + cr)? So it would become aAp + bAq + cAr?
 
  • #13
Yes, because A is linear (and a b and c are scalars). :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K