Can the equation E = pc be applied to particles?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 4K views
Mr.somebody
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Can the equation E = pc be applied to particles? Why or why not?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


It can be applied to particles that DONT have a rest mass (photons, which are particles). It can not be applied to particles that have a rest mass (almost everything).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So its only applicable to photons (and gluons)?
But you only make a stament and do not explain why it is so?
 
gleem said:
where of course mc2 = E
Just a clarification of what gleem is saying:
E over here is the total energy of the object. So the actual formula for this will be ##E= \gamma m_0 c^2##, where $$\gamma = \frac {1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$. By m, gleem means the relativistic mass (an orthodox concept, really) ##m=\gamma m_0##.
(I'm providing this clarification in case the OP accidentally uses the rest mass for the formula for E over here)
 
Last edited:
I get up to the point where it evaluates to E2(v2/c2)?
 
andrevdh said:
I get up to the point where it evaluates to E2(v2/c2)?
OK. Now substitute ##E=\gamma m_0 c^2## for E. What does this reduce to? Do you know the relativistic momentum expression?
 
I think it comes to (pc)2?
Which approaches the energy-momentum relation from the other side.
How is this relevant to the original question?
We evaluated a difference between two terms and found
that they are related to the relativistic momentum of the entity?
 
Last edited:
andrevdh said:
I think it comes to (pc)2?
Which approaches the energy-momentum relation from the other side.
How is this relevant to the original question?
We evaluated a difference between two terms and found
that they are related to the relativistic momentum of the entity?
It is relevant because you just derived the forumula ##pc=\sqrt{{\gamma}^2m_0^2 c^4 - m_0 ^2c^4} = \sqrt{E^2-m_0^2 c^4}##, proving the fact that ##E≠pc## if ##m_0 ≠0 ##, which I believe was your original question.
 
I'll think about it.
It seems to make sense.
Thank you.