Can the formula for G be used to measure gravity using a mass and spring system?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sharpy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of measuring the acceleration due to gravity (g) using a mass-spring system. Participants explore the relationship between the period of oscillation, mass, spring constant, and gravitational force, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of the setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in using a mass attached to a spring to measure g, despite having the period of bounce, mass, and elastic constant.
  • Another participant argues that the period of motion is independent of g, stating that the period is given by 2π√(m/k) and does not involve g.
  • Some participants suggest that the mass could affect the period due to gravity, raising questions about the relationship between mass, spring constant, and gravitational force.
  • A participant proposes using the formula for a simple pendulum, but later acknowledges the mistake, realizing the setup involves a spring, not a string.
  • There is a suggestion that the elastic constant of the spring could relate to the restoring force, which might be analogous to the force of gravity acting on the mass.
  • One participant mentions a formula involving the period and lengthening of the spring, suggesting it could yield a value for g, but this is met with skepticism from others.
  • Another participant insists that the period of oscillation does not depend on gravity, emphasizing that the spring and mass system behaves the same regardless of gravitational conditions.
  • Discussions about static measurements versus dynamic oscillations arise, with some participants advocating for measuring static deflection to find g more directly.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the definitions of variables, such as distinguishing between static deflection and the total length of the spring.
  • One participant admits to confusion regarding the elastic constant and its relationship to the measurements being taken.
  • There is a consensus that measuring the extension of the spring when a mass is applied is crucial, but the precision of such measurements is questioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of using the mass-spring system to measure g. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the role of gravity in the oscillation period and the appropriateness of static versus dynamic measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and relationships between variables, such as the elastic constant and gravitational force. There are unresolved questions about the precision of measurements and the assumptions underlying the proposed formulas.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring experimental methods for measuring gravitational acceleration, as well as students and enthusiasts of physics and engineering looking for insights into oscillatory motion and spring dynamics.

  • #31
cheers lpfr i already have and its doing great.
i do need my table of mass against extension as I am trying repeating with a range of mass so the extension and period change with the mass and i need to know what the extension is with a certain mass.
but that's awesome cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K