Can the Integration of 1/sin(x)e^(csc^2(x)) be Solved?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter custer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function 1/(sin(x) * exp(csc^2(x))). Participants explore whether this integral can be solved in terms of elementary functions, and they consider alternative approaches such as numerical integration and power series expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the possibility of solving the integral in terms of elementary functions.
  • One participant suggests that if the integral cannot be solved analytically, numerical methods or power series could be considered valid solutions.
  • Another participant proposes defining a new function, cus(x), based on the integral, and discusses its properties and potential applications.
  • Empirical data is presented by calculating the Taylor series of the integrand and comparing it to direct numerical integration, showing accurate results to six decimal places.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the integral can be solved in elementary terms. Multiple competing views remain regarding the validity of numerical solutions and the definition of new functions based on the integral.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the integrand and the conditions under which the proposed methods may be valid, such as the radius of convergence for the power series.

custer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm told that this integration can't be solved, can it ?

ʃ dx/(sin (x) . exp((csc x)^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since "almost all" elementary expressions cannot be integrated in terms of elementary expressions, the question really is, "do you have any reason to think it can be?"
 
custer said:
I'm told that this integration can't be solved, can it ?

ʃ dx/(sin (x) . exp((csc x)^2)

Make it so. Suppose that was all you were told. What would you do? Numerically counts as "solved" in my book. How about a power series? Can I use that (in principle) and integrate over it's radius of convergence? Ain't that a "solution"? Find a way . . . try. That's what math is about. :)
 
squidsoft said:
Make it so. Suppose that was all you were told. What would you do? Numerically counts as "solved" in my book. How about a power series? Can I use that (in principle) and integrate over it's radius of convergence? Ain't that a "solution"? Find a way . . . try. That's what math is about. :)

And if all else fails, and it's a useful enough integral, then give it a name, e.g.

"For all real x, we define

[tex]cus(x) = \int_{-\infty}^x \frac{dx}{\sin(x) \exp((\csc x)^2)}[/tex]"

Presto, solved! Now all you need to do is lobby for a calculator button. Oh, and maybe establish some facts about the function. If people like it enough, they might assign your name to it. It worked for Bessel.
 
If the integrand is:

[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{\sin(x)e^{\sec^2(x)}}[/tex]

then I'd suggest we define:

[tex]\text{cus}(x)=\int_0^x \frac{1}{\sin(x)e^{\sec^2(x)}}[/tex]

and I'd like to establish the first property of this [tex]\text{cus}(x)[/tex] (why? just be-cus):

[tex]\text{cus}(-x)=-\text{cus}(x)[/tex]

Also, just to get some empirical data about [tex]\text{cus}[/tex] (why, just . . . ok, I'll stop it), I calculated the first 25 terms of the Taylor series about the point [tex]x=\pi/2[/tex] and then calculated the antiderivative of those terms, substituted the limits [tex]\pi/4[/tex] and [tex]3\pi/4[/tex] then compared it to a direct numerical integration of the integrand. The results were accurate to 6 places:

Code:
f[x_] := 1/(Sin[x]*Exp[Csc[x]^2]); 
tay[x_] := Normal[Series[f[x], 
    {x, Pi/2, 25}]]
cus[x_] = Integrate[tay[x], x]
N[cus[3*(Pi/4)] - cus[Pi/4]]
NIntegrate[f[x], {x, Pi/4, 3*(Pi/4)}]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K