Can the Squeeze Theorem Determine the Limit of n^n/n! as x Approaches 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ignea_unda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of the expression n^n/n! as n approaches infinity, with references to the Squeeze Theorem as a potential method for evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore breaking down the factorial and the power terms to analyze their growth rates. There are attempts to apply the Squeeze Theorem and discussions about the implications of comparing n^n to n! and vice versa.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights and suggestions for rewriting the expressions to facilitate the application of the Squeeze Theorem. There is acknowledgment of differing interpretations regarding the limits and the use of the theorem, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the applicability of the Squeeze Theorem and the behavior of the limits involved, with some expressing uncertainty about proving divergence or convergence.

Ignea_unda
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Factorial Limits

Homework Statement



lim n^n
x->00 n!

Homework Equations


Instructor said to use the Squeeze theorem.


The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have not been able to come up with much. I have looked at breaking the top apart into (n)(n)(n)...(n) and the bottom into n(n-1)(n-2)...(2)(1). My instinct when plugging numbers in for examples says that it should diverge, but when I apply Induction to prove this hypothesis, I get a contradiction. I know I'm over thinking this one (or at least I hope I am). Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your instincts are right. Write it as (n/n)*(n/(n-1))*(n/(n-2)*...*(n/1). For i>=n/2. n/(n-i)>=2. For i<=n/2, n/(n-i)>=1. So the whole product must be greater than or equal to 2^(n/2), right? You may need to adjust a few details for n odd, and there actually may be a neater comparison, but that's what came mind first.
 
Thanks for the help. I looked at it again and talked to my professor. I was thinking that you couldn't use the squeeze theorem to prove that the limit was inifinity. Since it's not, I just compared it to n. Since n! >= n for all n, and n diverges to infinity, so does n^n/n!. Once again thanks for the quick reply.
 


I have the exact same problem, however it is the inverse:
lim n!
n->00 n^n

Fairly intuitively this limit will be zero, however I need to 'use the squeeze rule'
The lower limit can easily be 1/n^n whose limit is zero. However I cannot think of an upper limit to 'squeeze' my limit between. It must be greater than n!/n^n and yet must also have a limit of zero. Please help
 


Write it as (n/n)*((n-1)/n)*((n-2)/n)*...(1/n). All of the terms in the product are less than or equal to 1 and positive. n/2 terms are less then or equal to 1/2. Does that suggest a squeeze strategy?
 


This is exactly what I was thinking, but won't this only show that the limit is (considerably) less than 1/2? I don't believe this proves it is zero.
 


It shows that its less than (1/2)^(n/2). That is 'considerably' less than 1/2. What happens as n goes to infinity?
 


thanks, i overlooked that, that solves my problem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K