Can this particular method solve these quadratic equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving two quadratic equations, \(S_1 = ax^2 + 2hxy + by^2 + c = 0\) and \(S_2 = a'x^2 + 2h'xy + b'y^2 + c' = 0\). The proposed method involves treating \(S_1\) as a quadratic in \(x\) and substituting the solution into \(S_2\). However, participants note that this leads to a quartic equation in \(y\), which complicates the solution process. The consensus is that while the method may yield a solvable quartic, it does not provide a straightforward solution for \(x\) and \(y\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with solving quartic equations
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in algebra
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study methods for solving quartic equations, including Ferrari's method
  • Learn about the implications of substituting variables in polynomial equations
  • Explore the use of discriminants in determining the nature of roots in quadratics
  • Investigate alternative methods for solving systems of quadratic equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra, and anyone interested in solving complex polynomial equations will benefit from this discussion.

JohnnyGui
Messages
802
Reaction score
51
Given are two equations:
$$S_1 = ax^2+2hxy+by^2 + c=0$$
$$S_2 = a'x^2+2h'xy+b'y^2 + c'=0$$
This source states that there are several methods to solve for ##x## and ##y##. One of them is the following quote:"Treat equation ##S_1## as a quadratic equation in ##x## and solve it for ##x## in terms of ##y##. Then substitute this in equation ##S_2##."

If ##A=a##, ##B=2hy## and ##C=by^2+c##, this means that:
$$x=\frac{-2hy\pm \sqrt{4h^2y^2-4a(by^2+c)}}{2a}$$
However, substituting this in ##S_2## does not make me able to solve for ##x## and ##y##. Expressing ##x## also in terms of the constants of ##S_2## and substituting that in ##S_1## also doesn't help me.

Am I missing something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why not eliminate one of the quadratic terms - either ##x^2## or ##y^2##?
 
PeroK said:
Why not eliminate one of the quadratic terms - either ##x^2## or ##y^2##?

You mean as in dividing ##S_1## and ##S_2## by either ##x^2## or ##y^2##? I have tried that but I'm not sure how to continue to get ##x## or ##y## on one side.
 
JohnnyGui said:
You mean as in dividing ##S_1## and ##S_2## by either ##x^2## or ##y^2##? I have tried that but I'm not sure how to continue to get ##x## or ##y## on one side.
That won't work. Multiply ##S_1## by ##a'## and ##S_2## by ##a## and subtract one from the other.
 
PeroK said:
That won't work. Multiply S1 by a′ and S2 by a and subtract one from the other.

Thanks, but wouldn't this lead to another method to solve these equations? I was wondering whether the quoted method can actually be used to solve this.
 
JohnnyGui said:
Thanks, but wouldn't this lead to another method to solve these equations? I was wondering whether the quoted method can actually be used to solve this.
It doesn't look very promising to me.
 
Solving S1 for x gives you an expression of the general form ##x=my\pm\sqrt{ny^2+p}## where m,n,p are some constants.. That means ##x^2 = m^2 y^2\pm 2ym\sqrt{ny^2+p}+ny^2+p##. I'll ignore coefficients now, imagine prefactors for every term. Your full second equation then reads:

##0 = y^2 + y + 1 \pm y\sqrt{y^2+1}+y\sqrt{y^2+1}##.
The latter two terms can be combined and isolated:
##y\sqrt{y^2+1} = y^2 + y + 1##
Now square both sides:
##y^2(y^2+1) = (y^2 + y + 1)^2##
That's a quartic equation that is in principle solvable, but it doesn't sound like something you want to do. There might be combinations of coefficients that make this easier to handle.
 
JohnnyGui said:
Given are two equations:
$$S_1 = ax^2+2hxy+by^2 + c=0$$
$$S_2 = a'x^2+2h'xy+b'y^2 + c'=0$$
This source states that there are several methods to solve for ##x## and ##y##. One of them is the following quote:"Treat equation ##S_1## as a quadratic equation in ##x## and solve it for ##x## in terms of ##y##. Then substitute this in equation ##S_2##."

If ##A=a##, ##B=2hy## and ##C=by^2+c##, this means that:
$$x=\frac{-2hy\pm \sqrt{4h^2y^2-4a(by^2+c)}}{2a}$$
However, substituting this in ##S_2## does not make me able to solve for ##x## and ##y##. Expressing ##x## also in terms of the constants of ##S_2## and substituting that in ##S_1## also doesn't help me.

Am I missing something?
You end up in a quartic in y, which is solvable.
 
mfb said:
Solving S1 for x gives you an expression of the general form ##x=my\pm\sqrt{ny^2+p}## where m,n,p are some constants.

Why does this solution for ##x## not have the form of a fraction? It's missing a factor of ##\frac{1}{2a}## as mentioned in my opening post, isn't that how the solution of a quadratic function is defined according to the abc-formula?
 
  • #10
1/(2a) or its square is part of the constants m,n,p, I didn't write everything in terms of a,b,c because that would have made the equations unhandy.
 
  • #11
mathman said:
You end up in a quartic in y, which is solvable.
When substituting the solution for ##x## in the other equation, I get:
$$y^2 \bigg(a'\cdot \frac{(-2h\pm s)^2}{4a^2}+2h'\cdot \frac{-2h\pm s}{2a}+b'\bigg)+c'=0$$
Where ##s=\sqrt{4h^2-4ab+\frac{4ac}{y^2}}##. Not sure how such an equation can be solved.

Also, shouldn't a quartic equation have a variable to the power of ##>2##?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
JohnnyGui said:
When substituting the solution for ##x## in the other equation, I get:
$$y^2 \bigg(a'\cdot \frac{(-2h\pm s)^2}{4a^2}+2h'\cdot \frac{-2h\pm s}{2a}+b'\bigg)+c'=0$$
Where ##s=\sqrt{4h^2-4ab+\frac{4ac}{y^2}}##. Not sure how such an equation can be solved.

Also, shouldn't a quartic equation have a variable to the power of ##>2##?
You need to rearrange terms so that the square root expression is alone on one side of the equation. Square both sides to get a quartic polynomial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K