MHB Can Trigonometric Inequalities Be Proven with Simple Equations?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $$\tan x+\tan y+\tan z\ge \sin x \sec y+\sin y\sec z+\sin z \sec x$$ for $x,\,y,\,z\in \left(0,\,\dfrac{\pi}{2}\right)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:
WLOG let $x \le y \le z$ and $x,y,z \in \left ( 0,\frac{\pi }{2} \right )$.

Then $0 < sinx \le siny \le sinz < 1$, and $1 \le secx \le secy \le secz $.

Then, the result follows immediately from the Rearrangement Inequality:

\[tanx + tany + tanz = sinxsecx+sinysecy+sinzsecz \geq sinxsecy+sinysecz + sinzsecx\]

Any permutation of the RHS will obey the inequality.
 
Bravo, lfdahl and thanks for participating!(Cool)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top