Can Velocity Reverse Direction with Constant Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spdrxc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
Click For Summary
An object can reverse its direction while maintaining constant acceleration, as seen in circular motion examples like a car on a roundabout. When a rock is thrown straight up, it experiences constant acceleration due to gravity, approximately 9.8 m/s², even at the peak of its trajectory. This acceleration is consistent with Newton's second law, where the net force acting on the rock is its weight. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between velocity, direction change, and constant acceleration in various scenarios. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping motion dynamics.
spdrxc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1) Can the velocity of an object reverse direction while maintaining a constant acceleration? Can anyone give me an example of this?

2) What is the acceleration of a rock at the top of its trajectory when thrown straight upward? (Is it consistant with Newton's second law?)

If would really appreciate it if someone could help me out with these questions. Thank you guys for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes - toss a rock straight up and watch it carefully!

2) It's exactly the same as it is at every other point along its trajectory - ignoring air drag, etc.
 


1) Yes, it is possible for an object to reverse its direction while maintaining a constant acceleration. This can happen when an object is moving in a circular path, such as a car going around a roundabout, or a ball being swung on a string. In these cases, the object's velocity is constantly changing direction, but its acceleration remains constant towards the center of the circle.

2) The acceleration of the rock at the top of its trajectory when thrown straight upward would be equal to the acceleration due to gravity, which is approximately 9.8 m/s^2. This is consistent with Newton's second law, which states that the net force acting on an object is equal to its mass multiplied by its acceleration. In this case, the net force acting on the rock is its weight, which is equal to its mass multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
469
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
906
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K