Can virtual particles have an imaginary mass?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of virtual particles and their hypothetical imaginary mass, specifically referencing the implications for their movement and interaction. It is established that virtual particles do not possess real mass and are merely mathematical constructs within perturbative quantum field theory. The Casimir effect, often associated with virtual particles, can be accurately described without invoking their existence. The conversation emphasizes the importance of relying on credible sources and established scientific principles rather than anecdotal references.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbative quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of imaginary numbers in physics
  • Knowledge of the Casimir effect and its implications
  • Basic principles of special relativity, including the Lorentz factor
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formalism of perturbative quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of imaginary mass in theoretical physics
  • Investigate the Casimir effect and its derivation without virtual particles
  • Study the principles of special relativity and the limitations on particle speed
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the nuances of quantum mechanics and the interpretation of virtual particles.

Lunct
Messages
133
Reaction score
16
I was talking to a physicist who said to me that virtual particles can have a mass of a constant times by i ,as in the root of -1. I have been thinking about this more and it intrigues me. I have done some research into this and can't find further details.
If they have an imaginary mass does this mean their Lorentz factor can't be calculated? And if so, can they move faster than light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lunct said:
I have read that the casimir effect happens due to virtual particles, so then surely they must interact with something.

Casimir effect can be perfectly described without virtual particles. This has been discussed here multiple times, use "search" function. And also, again, I suggest reading links that I gave you. "Virtual particles" is just a name for a certain mathematical formulas that appear in perturbative quantum field theory. They don't exist outside the formalism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lunct
Lunct said:
I was talking to a physicist who said to me

You've been here long enough to know this is not an acceptable reference.

Lunct said:
I have read that

Nor is this.

We can spend a lifetime dealing with misheard and misunderstood comments from "I know a guy who knows a guy". But that doesn't mean we should.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lunct
Vanadium 50 said:
You've been here long enough to know this is not an acceptable reference.
Nor is this.

We can spend a lifetime dealing with misheard and misunderstood comments from "I know a guy who knows a guy". But that doesn't mean we should.
weirdoguy said:
Casimir effect can be perfectly described without virtual particles. This has been discussed here multiple times, use "search" function. And also, again, I suggest reading links that I gave you. "Virtual particles" is just a name for a certain mathematical formulas that appear in perturbative quantum field theory. They don't exist outside the formalism.
fair enough
 
Especially post #2 includes all that can be said to this subject, so I close this thread now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K