Can Warp Drive Exceed the Speed of Light?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jaiii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical possibility of warp drive exceeding the speed of light, exploring concepts of spacetime curvature, the expansion of the universe, and the implications of faster-than-light (FTL) travel in relation to galaxies and light propagation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where a spacecraft could curve spacetime around it to achieve FTL travel, suggesting that gravity could compensate for curvature.
  • Another participant asserts that it is impossible to exceed the speed of light.
  • A participant questions whether the universe's expansion could imply that we are already traveling FTL relative to other galaxies, referencing accepted theories.
  • It is noted that while galaxies can appear to move FTL relative to each other due to the expansion of space, this does not allow for local FTL travel.
  • One participant argues that the addition of velocities formula may not apply correctly to galaxies moving with the expansion of space, suggesting a potential flaw in its application.
  • Another participant agrees that while the addition of velocities is mathematically accurate, it represents only one way of conceptualizing the situation, emphasizing that galaxies may be causally disconnected despite their apparent FTL separation.
  • There is a discussion about the visibility of galaxies at the edge of the observable universe, with one participant suggesting that the age of the universe limits our ability to see them rather than their FTL motion.
  • A later reply claims that scientists acknowledge warp drive as consistent with scientific knowledge and capable of exceeding the speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the implications of FTL travel, the application of the addition of velocities, and the nature of galaxies' movement in an expanding universe. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of FTL travel, the assumptions about spacetime curvature, and the unresolved mathematical implications of the addition of velocities in the context of cosmic expansion.

jaiii
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to ask for such a theoretical case:

spacecraft moves in space and time and should be curved spacetime around the ship but is produced by gravity, which
would compensate for the curvature to zero and light and gravitational waves would have curved around the ship.
Ship could overcome the speed of light.

Thank you for your reply
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't overcome the speed of light.
 
If the universe was expanding FTL then wouldn't we already be traveling FTL relative to other galaxies? The universe traveling FTL seems to be an accepted TV theory already...
 
TV theory?!

Traveling 'faster than light' relative to something else, from another observer's reference frame is not an issue---and is accepted as you suggest, for instance, we observe quasars at the opposite ends of the visible universe to be moving FTL relative to each-other. Again, that's not an issue.

You can not travel faster than light relative to any local space-time.
 
Hey, the people saying it work at universities...

They say there is no problem with space itself expanding FTL, but the objects moveing with the expansion (galaxies) would then end up traveling FTL relative to each other.

Most of what I have read on the forums as to the reason galaxies on the opposite end of the universe do not travel FTL is because of the addition of velocities. But, if space can allow galaxies to travel FTL relative to each other then the addition formula would never be able to give their true velocity since they can travel FTL relative to each other and the formula itself by its own design would prevent that mathmatical result. So then wouldn't applying addition of velocity to galaxies traveling with the expansion of space just be wrong?
 
John232 said:
So then wouldn't applying addition of velocity to galaxies traveling with the expansion of space just be wrong?
Yes. That's definitely very accurate. But it is also only one way of 'thinking about it' / 'describing it.' You're right, and it is the mathematically correct way of describing it.
Another way of *thinking about it* however, is that these two hypothetical galaxies are forever outside of causal connection with each other. They will never see each other, never know the other exists. A laser traveling from one towards the other will never reach its destination... thus in this respect, they are distancing themselves at a rate FTL.
 
Also, the galaxies on the edge of the visable universe traveling close to the speed of light wouldn't even be able to observe a galaxy on the opposite end of our visable universe. They would observe us to be on the edge of their own visable universe and the other galaxies out beyond ours in complete darkness.
 
So then the addition formula isn't being used on galaxies already? I have had a hard time getting a quick responce or finding an older one on this topic.

I think the reason for the edge of the visable universe is more of being a problem with the age of the universe. Light would not have had time to travel that distance since its birth. That was Einsteins reasoning but back then we didn't have the telescopes we have now to determine the actual size. But, I don't think we can not see them because they are traveling FTL. The velocity of a photon is unaffected by the velocity of the object it comes from, unless it was only a great enough distance that it lost its wavelike properties by being streatched out from the expansion of space itself from going over that distance.
 
But scientists acknowledge that warp drive is In line with scientific knowledge and also exceeds the speed of light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K