Can we assume constant C14 to C12 ratio in living tissues?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wywong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assumption of a constant C14 to C12 ratio in living tissues and its implications for carbon-14 dating. It is established that plants preferentially absorb C12 over C13, resulting in a lower C13 to C12 ratio in plants compared to the atmosphere. However, the discrimination against C14 is minimal, and the fractionation correction for C14 is approximately twice that of C13. Environmental factors, such as fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field and fossil fuel emissions, significantly affect the atmospheric C14 levels, leading to variability in the C14 fraction over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of carbon isotopes, specifically C12, C13, and C14.
  • Knowledge of photosynthesis and its impact on isotopic ratios.
  • Familiarity with carbon-14 dating techniques and their corrections.
  • Awareness of environmental factors affecting atmospheric carbon levels.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of photosynthesis on carbon isotopic ratios in plants.
  • Study the methodologies for correcting C14 dating using the 13C/12C ratio.
  • Explore the implications of the fossil fuel effect on atmospheric C14 levels.
  • Investigate historical fluctuations in Earth's magnetic field and their impact on cosmic radiation and C14 production.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in radiocarbon dating, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in the effects of isotopic fractionation on carbon dating accuracy.

wywong
Messages
146
Reaction score
6
Plants prefer C12 to C13 during photosynthesis, so that the C13 to C12 ratio in plants is less than that in the atmosphere (by around 20% for most plants, but less difference in C4 plants like maize). Do plants discriminate against C14 too? If so, won't that cause a considerable uncertainty in carbon-14 dating?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Thanks jim mcnamara for your reply.

I find it hard to believe the same photosynthesis process discriminates against C13 but not against C14 which is heavier than C13. I did a google search and found this article:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...e-for-13c12c/7034794E608EB5B6A3F8ED31D4FA38AD

If I understand correctly, the discrimination against C14 is more than twice that against C13, but the former can be more or less corrected for based on the later. That answers my original question.
 
I think the the fractionation is about 2% (15 to 27 per mil). For 14C it is twice as much. In Radicarbon dating (and other 14C applications) , the 13C/12C ratio is used to correct for this effect.
 
Well, looking at articles such as this one...
https://phys.org/news/2021-02-earth-magnetic-field-broke-years.html

...it seems that Earth's magnetic field has went through some tumultuous instability in the past. What happens when it weakens is that it allows a lot more of cosmic radiation to penetrate lower altitudes, and this again will increase the amount of atmospheric C14.

So there are points in the past where C14 cannot be assumed to have been whatever it is assumed to be today due to environmental reasons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bruzote
The 14C fraction of carbon varies. The cosmonenic production changes (it is about 5 kilogram 14C per year) and the reservoir (the amount of carbon) changes. For instance by burning fosil fuel the amonunt of carbon as CO2 in the atmosphere increases and the 14C/12C ratio drops. This is the fossil fuel effect. The famous journal Radiocarbon has many hundreds of research articles dealing with this interesting question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bruzote

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
28K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K