Can we attain a disire approxomation for asymptotic perturbative QTF Theo?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of achieving arbitrary small errors in asymptotic perturbative Quantum Field Theory (QFT), particularly in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). While QED exhibits effective convergence in high-order perturbative calculations, QCD presents significant difficulties due to gluon self-interaction, leading to poor convergence in series expansions. The conversation highlights the necessity of employing resummation schemes, specifically the 2PI formalism combined with the hard-thermal loop (HTL) approximation, to achieve accurate predictions for quark-gluon plasma pressure at elevated temperatures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory and its applications
  • Knowledge of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Concept of resummation techniques in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the 2PI formalism in Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about the hard-thermal loop (HTL) approximation
  • Explore advanced perturbation theory techniques in QCD
  • Investigate lattice-QCD calculations for comparison with perturbative results
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum field theory, and students interested in advanced topics related to perturbative methods and their applications in particle physics.

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this(please forgive me if stupid question):
Can we attain an arbitrary small error(e.g calculating S-matrix) for an asymptotic perturbative QTF Theory.Because if we can not,I think that is problematic.But with asymptotic perturbative theory,in general the series does not converge,so the error may not tend to zero.
Thank you very much in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the theory. For QED up to now we have a phantatic "convergence", i.e., doing high-order perturbative calculations leadds to a very good accuracy for observed quantities (in comparison to experiment). For asymptotic series, one should stop at the order of the calculation where an n-th order correction (in whatever approximation scheme you work; in QFT usually you work in the number of loops, i.e., orders of [itex]\hbar[/tex]) becomes larger than the correction at (n-1)-th order.<br /> <br /> If it comes to QCD, which is much more complicated due to the self interaction of the gluons, we usually observe a very bad "convergence" of the series. E.g., if you calculate the pressure of a quark-gluon plasma, it alternates like crazy between the different orders. Thus perturbation theory for this (in principle observable quantity!) becomes ill defined right away. The solution for this problem are clever resummation schemes. In this case one has to use the 2PI formalism of quantum field theory in combination with the hard-thermal loop (HTL) approximation which leads to the notion of massive quasi particles making up the pressure of the QGP. This method is a pretty good approximation for temperatures above two to three times the critical temperature, as can be shown by comparing to lattice-QCD calculations.[/itex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K